Search for: "Long v. California"
Results 301 - 320
of 10,913
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jun 2015, 3:04 pm
Given the frequent use of pre-litigation jury trial waivers in contracts, it may be news to some that such waivers are considered unenforceable under California law since the California supreme court’s decision in Grafton Partners L.P. v. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 3:04 pm
Given the frequent use of pre-litigation jury trial waivers in contracts, it may be news to some that such waivers are considered unenforceable under California law since the California supreme court’s decision in Grafton Partners L.P. v. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 3:45 pm
Reliance on the California case Leighton v. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 10:35 am
The Supreme Court first addressed the problem squarely in its 1987 decision in California v. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 11:01 am
If I were Attorney General of California, Judge Carney's decision in Jones v. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 10:19 am
It’s been a long time since CBL has posted about California’s Unfair Competition Law, and even longer since we blogged about anti-trust law. [read post]
28 Nov 2007, 7:44 pm
On November 6, 2007, the California Supreme Court heard long-awaited arguments in the closely watched "medical marijuana" case of Ross v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 4:20 pm
(Citizens Climate Lobby v. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 5:30 am
AB-5 codified the California Supreme Court’s June 2018 decision in Dynamex Operations West v. [read post]
15 May 2012, 1:57 pm
The California Supreme Court recently released its long awaited decision in the class action case Brinker v. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 2:30 am
The recent UK Appellate judgment in Tracey v. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 1:29 pm
On February 7, 2011, the California Court of Appeal in Arechiga v. [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 8:31 pm
In 2014, the California Supreme Court ruled in Iskanian v. [read post]
24 Sep 2018, 5:02 am
In Johnson v. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 11:58 am
Left were counts that looked to California’s long-arm statute, which permits a court to exercise personal jurisdiction provided that the state and federal constitutions so permit. [read post]
9 Mar 2019, 3:44 pm
In 2016, the California Supreme Court held in Kilby v. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 2:04 am
” The referenced case is Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. [read post]
11 May 2018, 4:15 am
On May 14th the next chapter in the Samsung v. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 4:55 pm
Five months later the court grants rehearing en banc.2013: The Supreme Court decides in Maryland v. [read post]
