Search for: "Long v. Secretary, Department of Corrections"
Results 301 - 320
of 389
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Nov 2011, 5:17 am
Admittedly the Justice case recently experienced a vogue of attention in the United States, particularly among lawyers looking for possible precedents for bringing charges against the authors of the “torture memos” in Bush’s Justice Department.[4] But even this brief renaissance of interest quickly waned as the precedential relevance of the Justice appeared smaller than hoped.[5] The fact that the NMT program has long been treated as nothing more than a footnote… [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 7:10 pm
Department of Health and Human Services v. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 7:37 pm
Like Vance v. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 1:26 am
AM v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWHC 2486 (Admin) (03 October 2011) October 3, 2011 Mr Justice Silber in High Court: Refusal to amend 5 aspects of control order was lawful. [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 10:07 am
Mahajna v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWHC 2481 (Admin) (30 September 2011). [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 11:00 pm
The correct appreciation of the effect of Pankina was apparent in R (on the application of Nough) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (2010) EWHC 2218 (Admin). [read post]
4 Sep 2011, 7:15 am
Department of Social Services. [read post]
4 Sep 2011, 7:15 am
Department of Social Services. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 6:34 am
If this is not the case, then I am happy to receive a correction giving details of Halliwells’ housing practice and Mr Berry’s professional involvement in housing cases. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 6:34 am
If this is not the case, then I am happy to receive a correction giving details of Halliwells’ housing practice and Mr Berry’s professional involvement in housing cases. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 10:23 am
Exemption from disclosure of information – (1) Notwithstanding anything contained in this Act, there shall be no obligation to give any citizen,- (a) information, disclosure of which would prejudicially affect the sovereignty and integrity of India, the security, strategic, scientific or economic interests of the State, relation with foreign State or lead to incitement of an offence; (b) information which has been expressly forbidden to be published by any court of law or… [read post]
31 Jul 2011, 9:00 am
In Secretary, Irrigation Department, Government of Orissa and Others vs. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 5:46 pm
Secretary, Department of Corrections (No. 6:07-cv-839-Orl-35-KRS) that the new version of the offense facially violates the Due Process Clause. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 12:59 pm
Secretary, Department of Corrections (No. 6:07-cv-839-Orl-35-KRS) that the new version of the offense facially violates the Due Process Clause. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 3:05 pm
By Michael TarrantRheaume v. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 10:06 am
Secretary, Indian Tea Association & Others (2001) 5 SCC 42, the Court placed reliance on the judgment of a nine-judge Bench in Naresh Shridhar Mirajkar v. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 6:07 pm
John, who argued the Ozanne v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 7:55 am
Correct test for homelessness under Housing Act 1996: meaning of “violence” expanded to include threats / intimidation / indirect abuse, as well as physical violence XZ (Tanzania) v SoS Home Department [2011] UKSC 4. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 7:32 am
Ward v. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 4:38 pm
Also differences based on housing status has been held to be within Art 14 (Larkos v Cyprus 30 EHRR 597, R (RJM) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2009] 1 AC 311).If the arguments were right, it would affect many provisions of the Housing Acts and Rent Acts. [read post]
