Search for: "Lowe v. Department of Corrections" Results 301 - 320 of 614
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Feb 2016, 1:00 pm by Blake Marcus
Reasonable suspicion is a relatively low threshold to meet and only requires there be some objective reason for the stop: something more than just a hunch. [read post]
20 Feb 2016, 3:30 am by Ray Dowd
   For a recent Department of Commerce White Paper that discusses the debate, visit here. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 6:07 am
Even had the marks departed significantly from the norm and customs of the sector, the average consumer would not consider them as designating the origin of the taxis. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 8:57 am by Dennis Crouch
MGA Entertainment, Inc., et al., No. 15-635 (Stryker/Halo follow-on – potential wait-and-see) Low Quality Brief: Morales v. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 4:00 am by Administrator
As noted by Braiden and Brockman, whether or not the Department of Justice officials are partial or impartial in their decisions, it is imperative that justice appears to have been achieved. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 6:00 am by Administrator
Some law professors and externship directors are using blogging to enhance their classes.[24] Some career-services departments advise students not only to remove embarrassing social-media content but to affirmatively establish a positive web presence.[25] And of course law professors have been blogging and debating the merits of blogging as legal scholarship for many years.[26] This article focuses on blogging by practicing lawyers and law students seeking a career in law practice as… [read post]
11 Nov 2015, 7:32 am by INFORRM
 The GDPR’s new, low bar for protection of free expression on the Internet will shape future cases before DPAs and courts, and will likely also affect legislation in other areas. [read post]
29 Oct 2015, 3:00 am by Daphne Keller
 The GDPR’s new, low bar for protection of free expression on the Internet will shape future cases before DPAs and courts, and will likely also affect legislation in other areas. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 5:32 am
Malapprop, “whatever a lawyer is doing is, ipso facto, correct because a lawyer doing it. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 7:05 am by Laura Stefani
That decision was reversed by the full NTSB on relatively narrow grounds not relating to the FAA’s “commercial v. recreational” distinction, and the case was eventually settled, with the drone operator admitting to no violations of any rules. [read post]
14 Aug 2015, 6:46 am by Shea Denning
Yesterday, the Connecticut Supreme Court held in a 4-3 decision in State v. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 4:33 pm by INFORRM
(For a good summary of this low point in our constitutional history, see this Mail & Guardian article and the Johannesburg Bar Council’s media release on the issue). [read post]