Search for: "M/V LORD"
Results 301 - 320
of 914
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Nov 2007, 3:36 am
The recent House of Lords decision in R v. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 3:02 am
[M]atters relating to reserved matters are also reserved. [read post]
17 Dec 2017, 4:16 pm
Events 16 January 2018, “Various Claimants v W M Morrison Ltd: Opening the data breach floodgates? [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 5:00 am
In 2008, the House of Lords gave judgment in R v Davis [2008] UKHL 36; [2008] 1 AC 1128. [read post]
21 Jan 2021, 1:34 pm
Further, Lord Hodge in R(N) v Lewisham had expressly addressed s.188(3) accommodation and held “accommodation pending a review does not make the property a home or a property “let as a dwelling””. [read post]
6 Nov 2008, 9:20 am
The case of KSJ v WRW [2008] EWCA Civ 1207 was reported yesterday on Bailli. [read post]
2 Sep 2020, 5:15 am
In layman’s terms, pseudolaw is pure nonsense.AVI v. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 1:10 pm
I’m not sure. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 6:18 am
Buried on Page 85 of Lord Nimmo Smith’s report, it states : “The Advocate Depute telephoned the Lord Advocate, Lord Fraser, who was in London. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 1:18 am
He refers to the M v The Home Office in which an affidavit produced by a Cabinet Minister as showing there was nothing to prevent a Cabinet Minister from producing an affidavit. 1505: Aidan O’Neill QC continues to read from the letter. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 3:23 pm
In a dramatically divided but decisively 6-3 decision in Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 3:23 pm
In a dramatically divided but decisively 6-3 decision in Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 2:25 am
See also Marilyn Stowe's post, below.S v M [2012] EWHC (15 November 2012)Appeal by husband against maintenance order. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 10:00 pm
Mitty J surveyed the various tests for proportionality, articulated in the common law (by Lord Clyde in de Freitas v Permanent Secretary of Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries, Lands and Housing [1991] 1 AC 69; in Strasbourg (Sporrong & Lönnroth v Sweden [1982] 5 EHRR 35) and James v United Kingdom [1986] 8EHRR 123. [read post]
2 Apr 2011, 5:11 am
In T M Noten BV v. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 4:52 am
Or, more recently and pertinently to this case since it involves discrimination, the case of Ghaidan v Godin-Mendoza [2004] UKHL 30 where the House of Lords ruled that the relevant provisions of the 1977 Rent Act treats the survivors of homosexual relationships less favourably than survivors of heterosexual relationships. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 11:25 pm
Lambeth LBC v Kay [2006] UKHL 10; [2006] 2 A.C. 465; [2006] H.L.R. 22, per Lord Nichols [61] and Lord Hope [64]. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 11:25 pm
Lambeth LBC v Kay [2006] UKHL 10; [2006] 2 A.C. 465; [2006] H.L.R. 22, per Lord Nichols [61] and Lord Hope [64]. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 1:17 am
”Lord Mathews commented on the size of Mr Hastings £150K claim for damages, saying : “I do not consider, on the evidence before me, that the damages should be as great as they were in for example Munro v Brown, and I assess solatium at £15,000. [read post]
