Search for: "MARK D. LINK" Results 301 - 320 of 4,274
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Feb 2023, 6:09 am
Briefs and other papers for each case may be found at TTABVUE via the links provided.March 7, 2023 - 10 AM [Virtual]: Alaskan Brewing & Bottling Co. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 2:30 am
Briefs and other papers for these cases may be found at TTABVUE via the links provided. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 3:31 am
Additional commentary on each case may be found at the linked TTABlog posting. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 10:36 pm
  Once the geographical indication has been granted, article L.711-4 d) of the French intellectual property Code forbids registering a mark which would infringe such geographical indication. [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 6:14 am
The Board found this factor to be neutral.As indicated, the Board found the first du Pont factor to be dispositive, and so it reversed the Section 2(d) refusal.Read comments and post your comment here.TTABlog comment: How did you do? [read post]
18 Jul 2008, 11:00 am
The vibes were not good for Vibe Records, Inc. when its president tried to file an opposition to registration of the mark VIBE REVOLUTIONS for "Providing links to web sites of others featuring retail stores, coupons, online music purchases and magazine subscriptions. [read post]
1 May 2017, 7:26 am
Briefs and other papers for these cases may be found at TTABVUE via the links provided. [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 2:45 am
 Briefs and other papers for each case may be found at TTABVUE via the links provided. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 3:16 am
Briefs and other  papers for these cases may be found at TTABVUE via the links provided. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 11:00 am
In addition to the October 24th hearing set for Boston (link here), the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board has scheduled nine (9) hearings for the month of October, as listed below. [read post]
5 Jan 2024, 3:33 am
Additional commentary on each case may be found at the linked TTABlog post. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 2:06 pm by Joe Patrice
I'd actually love seeing Vince as a union-busting heel. [read post]
19 Sep 2016, 10:00 pm
Bayer Consumer Care AG and Bayer Healthcare LLC, holding that Bayer does have standing under §43(a), (a) because the cause of action under §43(a) does not require that Bayer possess a protectable interest in the mark, instead that the defendant must have "use[d] in commerce"the offending "word, term, name, [or] symbol,"but the plaintiff needs only "believe[] that he or she is or is likely to be damaged by such act. [read post]
13 Apr 2022, 7:48 am by Albert W. Alschuler
” In its McGahn ruling, OLC “respectfully disagree[d]” with Bates’s decision and “adhered to this Office’s long-established position that the President’s immediate advisers are absolutely immune from compelled congressional testimony. [read post]