Search for: "MARRIAGE OF NELSON" Results 301 - 320 of 395
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jan 2011, 6:34 am by Amanda Rice
Nelson, Harrington v. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 7:14 pm by Andrew Perlman
In 2011, my wife and I share many fundamental interests by virtue of our marriage, but her viewsregarding issues of public significance are her own, and cannot be imputed to me,no matter how prominently she expresses them. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 10:22 pm by legalinformatics
Abstract: Presenting an interweaving example of the discursive hierarchical and hegemonic power constructs that are typically prevalent within family law cases, this performative narrative presents a ‘verbal space-as-text’ framework highlighting the complexities of power relations, social conventions and immigration, while challenging traditional beliefs and assumptions about the norms of marriage and divorce. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 9:55 am
The bill finds, inter alia:Child marriage, also known as 'forced marriage' or 'early marriage', is a harmful traditional practice that deprives girls of their dignity and human rights. and:Child marriage as a traditional practice, as well as through coercion or force, is a violation of article 16 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which states, 'Marriage shall be entered into only with the free and full consent of… [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 7:09 am by Theo Francis
They can tell you that marriage is out at the moment in America, and that atheists know more religious trivia than religious people. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 8:42 pm by Transplanted Lawyer
Nelson (1972) 409 U.S. 810, a one-line opinion by the Supreme Court declining to grant review to a decision of the Minnesota Supreme Court that denied marriage to a same-sex couple in the early 1970's for want of a "substantial Federal question. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 4:22 pm by Lyle Denniston
Judge Reinhardt pressed Olson to say whether the Circuit Court, in order to strike down the marriage ban, had to declare that there was a constitutional right to gay marriage. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 10:02 pm by Eugene Volokh
Nelson, 718 F.2d 315, 321 (9th Cir. 1983); see also Sao Paulo State of the Federated Republic of Brazil v. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 9:08 pm
Nelson for want of a substantial federal question. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 9:18 am by Susan I. Nelson
Among other changes, the new version does the following: Excludes from eligibility those with certain criminal convictions, such as for offenses punishable by a maximum term of more than 1 year (felony) or 3 misdemeanorsRequires all applicants to provide their biometric data to DHS, to submit to background checks and medical examination, and to register for military selective service Requires applicants to pay all taxes Sets the cut-off age to those who are less than 30 years-old on the date of… [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 8:09 am by Gabe Acevedo
.* There were two company marriages this week in the legal technology space. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 7:49 am by University of Pennsylvania Law Review
The Argument for Same-Sex Marriage In PENNumbra’s debate on same-sex marriage, Professors Nelson Tebbe and Deborah Widiss revisit their argument that equal access, and not equal protection or substantive due process, is the legal theory most likely to lead to a successful recognition of a constitutional right to same-sex marriage. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 10:43 am by Lyle Denniston
”  Stormer ran through a series of Supreme Court decisions about protections for fundamental rights, such as procreation, marriage, sexual relations and family relations. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 4:40 pm by Meredith Harbach
Nelson, the Supreme Court summarily dismissed an appeal from Minnesota’s Supreme Court upholding that state’s same-sex marriage ban because the case didn’t raise a substantial federal question. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 8:00 am by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
MAYOR BLOOMBERG SIGNS LEGISLATION TO MAKE INFORMATION ABOUT SAME SEX MARRIAGES AND DOMESTIC PARTNERSHIPS AVAILABLE ONLINE Remarks by Mayor Bloomberg at a Public Hearing on Local Laws (September 9, 2010) "The first of two bills before me today is Introductory Number 260-A, sponsored by Speaker Quinn and Council Members Brewer, Comrie, Dromm, Fidler, James, Koslowitz, Lander, Lappin, Palma, Van Bramer, Mark-Viverito, Jackson, Garodnick, Mendez, Nelson, Koppell, Reyna, Eugene,… [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 6:50 am by Adam Chandler
Nelson will also be argued in October. [read post]
17 Aug 2010, 8:09 am by Jenny Egan
Nelson, a 1972 case that was dismissed for lack of a substantial federal question. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 9:59 am by Lyle Denniston
Nelson (409 U.S. 410), dismissing an appeal “for want of a substantial federal question. [read post]