Search for: "MATTER OF C R O" Results 301 - 320 of 1,791
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Nov 2014, 7:38 pm
Next question: does it matter which Board of Appeal hears your case when it comes to the distinctiveness inquiry under Article 7(1)(b)? [read post]
30 Jan 2010, 4:37 pm by Bill Marler
The authors of the hepatitis A blog conduct surveillance on matters related to hepatitis A's impact on individuals and families in different cities, states, and regions. [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 2:55 pm
Bilski BPAI Decision [Patently-O Commentary] [StepBack’s Discussion] Patently-O: Discussing the Section 101 Squad of Cases. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 8:37 pm by Kevin LaCroix
For example, many D&O policies have shared coverage limits. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (UNISON) v Lord Chancellor, heard 27-28 Mar 2017. [read post]
8 May 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Miller & Ors v Ministory of Justice; O’Brien v Ministry of Justice; and Walker v Innospec Ltd & Ors, heard 8-9 Mar 2017. [read post]
14 Dec 2022, 10:00 pm by Chijioke Okorie
The Court held that it was not disputed that the applicant is the registered owner of the trade mark “OR” S” thus giving the applicant the exclusive right to the trade mark, however, the Applicant had not made out a prima facie case to warrant the granting of orders of injunction and that the Applicant did not place sufficient evidence to sustain the claim on loss of goodwill. [read post]
17 Mar 2021, 4:00 am by Administrator
Il ne s’agit pas d’un cas où le client a induit volontairement son courtier en erreur mais plutôt de celui où le courtier n’a pas rempli son rôle adéquatement. [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 2:32 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Let us assume that they buy D&O coverage and that this policy, despite being for a private company, contains securities Side C with a loose definition of “security”. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 2:59 am by Henry Gao
Instead, only (a.i) will apply, which means that the investigating authorities have to use China;s own costs NO MATTER WHETHER the producers can prove market economy conditions. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 7:05 am by WOLFGANG DEMINO
Pure legal conclusions or matters not involving extrinsic evidence, are subject to de novo review under the abuse of discretion standard. [read post]
14 Feb 2019, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
This means that, as a practical matter, those cases are likely invisible to those lawyers who rely on Westlaw rather than the print reporters. [read post]
18 Jul 2007, 9:02 am
A different Patently-O commenter wrote:There are VERY few actual individual inventors that invented something of value without the R&D of the evil "big business. [read post]