Search for: "MATTER OF K A B"
Results 301 - 320
of 2,704
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jan 2013, 5:01 pm
The Board then discussed sufficiency of disclosure and found the invention to be sufficiently disclosed.The main request and first auxiliary request were found to lack novelty.The subject-matter of the second auxiliary request was found to be novel, but the Board was not able to take a final decision on inventive step:[6.4.1] The OD based its assessment of inventive step when discussing the proprietor’s 3rd auxiliary request on a prior art that it identified as A0, which was… [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 5:01 pm
In such a situation the introduction of this ground for opposition can result from the fact that the reasons for the decision contain substantiated statements regarding that matter.[2.4] In point 3.3 of its decision the OD refers, in an unambiguous and sufficient way, to the legal and factual framework of the ground for opposition according to which the skilled person can “can carry out” (thereby implicitly mentioning [the German version of] A 100(b)) a waterstop device… [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 5:01 pm
It pointed out that the decision contained no statement as regards the opposition ground under A 100(b). [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 9:05 am
b. [read post]
10 May 2013, 3:16 pm
It's what (a) did (b) did not cause the flash crash of '87. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 9:33 am
Kucera, Senior Assistant Attorney General; Susan K. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 5:01 pm
The Board had something to say on this matter:*** Translation of the German original ***Substantiation of the ground of opposition[2.1] The [patent proprietor] has submitted that the ground of opposition under A 100(b) EPC 1973 had been insufficiently substantiated and, consequently, was inadmissible.The ground of opposition under A 100(b) EPC 1973 has been introduced into the proceedings by the OD […]. [read post]
15 Nov 2012, 5:01 pm
A process for removing nitrogen oxides from flue gas issuing from a regenerator of a fluidized catalytic cracking unit wherein the flue gas is cleaned of substantial amounts of dust in the regenerator, the process comprising the steps of:a) directing the flue gas into a tertiary cyclone separator and separating the solids therefrom so that not more than 250mg/Nm3 of solids exit in an overflow from the tertiary cyclone separator and causing between 0.5% and 6% percentage of flue gas entering the… [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 5:16 am
Wong (Alan) and Michael Wong Kin Hang a/k/a Michael K.H. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 5:01 pm
The international search report (ISR) covered the subject-matter of all claims. [read post]
3 Oct 2010, 7:00 pm
Mayoras and Danielle B. [read post]
26 May 2016, 3:18 am
PwC has advised the Company that it continues to have discussions with the SEC’s Staff to resolve this interpretive matter. [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 5:01 pm
As a matter of fact, under R 106, a petition under A 112a(2)(c) is only admissible where an objection in respect of the procedural defect was raised during the appeal proceedings and dismissed by the BoA, except where such objection could not be raised during the appeal proceedings. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 6:39 am
City of Memphis, Tennessee, November 14, 2014, Moore, K.). [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 7:24 am
Thus, familiarity7.b) with the FSTP-Test8) pays. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 10:03 pm
The inability to expeditiously close down businesses or companies in India often forms the subject matter of critical comment about doing business in India. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 5:01 pm
(Citing the earlier version of the Guidelines at C-III, 7.7; for the current version, see the Guidelines, B-VII, 2.2).[3.2] However, the actions of the Search Division (SD) are not subject to appeal: see A 106(1) and T 2495/11 [2.1-2]. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 1:50 pm
Like its federal counterpart, Mississippi Rule of Evidence 801(d)(1)(A) provides that A statement is not hearsay if... [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 6:15 am
Fee Disclosure Questions to Answer Also consider the Section 408(b)(2) fee disclosure rules that have been in effect since August 2012. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 5:01 pm
Independent claims in the same category; R 29(2) EPC 1973[4.3] As set out in the appealed decision, the subject-matter claimed in the independent method claims 1 and 10, as well as the subject-matter claimed in the independent apparatus claims 3 and 12, does not involve any of the exceptions (a), (b) or (c) mentioned under R 29(2) EPC 1973. [read post]
