Search for: "MATTER OF M J R" Results 301 - 320 of 2,334
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Dec 2023, 6:30 am
Thomas, Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP, on Saturday, November 25, 2023 Tags: California, climate disclosures, CRFRA, GHG SEC Adopts Final Rules to Amend Beneficial Ownership Reporting Rules Posted by Stephen Fraidin, Erica Hogan and Richard Brand, Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP, on Sunday, November 26, 2023 Tags: Beneficial Ownership, Cash-settled derivatives, Filings, reporting 2023 Annual ESG Preparedness Report Posted by Frederik Otto, Jeannette Lichner and Adélaïde… [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 6:30 am
Thomas, Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP, on Saturday, November 25, 2023 Tags: California, climate disclosures, CRFRA, GHG SEC Adopts Final Rules to Amend Beneficial Ownership Reporting Rules Posted by Stephen Fraidin, Erica Hogan and Richard Brand, Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP, on Sunday, November 26, 2023 Tags: Beneficial Ownership, Cash-settled derivatives, Filings, reporting 2023 Annual ESG Preparedness Report Posted by Frederik Otto, Jeannette Lichner and Adélaïde… [read post]
23 Nov 2020, 2:03 pm by Eugene Volokh
I can't opine on the merits of the matter, since I'm not up on the relevant Pennsylvania law (and this is a question of state law, not of the U.S. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 1:32 pm by Joel R. Brandes
Janice R. (14 NY3d 576 [2010], cert denied 562 U.S. 1136 [2011]), its earlier precedents, thereby greatly expanding the definition of who can obtain status as a parent and have standing to seek custody and visitation of a child. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 2:00 pm
Web-Based Practice Management Arrives for Small Firms By Neil J. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 1:07 am by INFORRM
Fancourt J commented that this pair have recently had “a lot to say about this matter outside of court. [read post]
11 Oct 2013, 1:45 am by Andrew Dickinson
If, however, the application had been determined under the new legislation, a different test (more favourable to the defendant) would have applied, requiring the court to ask whether a New Zealand court having jurisdiction is the “more appropriate court” to determine the matters in issue (s. 17(1); see also s. 19). [read post]