Search for: "MATTER OF T A AND T R A"
Results 301 - 320
of 53,767
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Sep 2009, 5:19 pm
So are the representatives of the office of C&R. [9]To read the whole decision, click here. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 5:01 pm
In accordance with R 115(2), the proceedings continued without him. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 5:01 pm
As a matter of fact, the original disclosure does not even expressly refer to these different categories of SFCs. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 3:04 pm
In the minutes of the oral proceedings (OPs) before the OD it is indicated "regarding the matter of the late filing of documents D8 to D11, the opponent explained essentially that this was in reaction to the provisional opinion set out by the opposition division in its annex to the invitation to the OPs". [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 5:01 pm
In the referring decision T 1068/07 [14] leading to decision G 2/10 of the EBA it was held that the subject-matter of the disclaimer had been disclosed as an embodiment of the invention in the application as filed. [read post]
12 Oct 2018, 7:11 am
Hereby, the multiplicity of interlocked features rendered the changes in subject-matter of the auxiliary requests very complex.As a result, auxiliary requests 1 and 2 were not admitted in the proceedings and the patent was revoked.Sachverhalt und AnträgeI. [read post]
19 May 2009, 9:20 am
CHANGE: Democrats Won’t Fund Guantanamo Closing. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 2:00 am
Supreme Court to Arizona Fire District: Size Doesn’t Matter appeared first on HR Daily Advisor. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 2:00 am
Supreme Court to Arizona Fire District: Size Doesn’t Matter appeared first on HR Daily Advisor. [read post]
13 Apr 2021, 2:30 am
In a another Board decision (T 777/15), this was denied. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 3:01 pm
” (see T 934/91). [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 3:01 pm
By choosing the option of OPs rather than a third notification, the ED has acted within the margin of manoeuvre provided by A 94(3) and R 71(1). [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 3:02 pm
As has been observed elsewhere (see T 87/05), the RPBA are in part at least a codification of the case-law on procedural practice. [read post]
23 May 2022, 5:13 am
The Board of Appeal in T 1444/20 explicitly agreed with the reasoning in T 1989/18 (r. 3.3). [read post]
19 Oct 2021, 11:54 pm
P., Stevenson, T. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 3:02 pm
A number of decisions of the EPO Boards of Appeal have pointed out however that a decision form which refers to several communications, leaving it to the board of appeal and the appellant to speculate as to which of the reasons given by the ED in its communications might be essential to the decision to refuse the application does not meet the ‘reasoned’ requirement of R 68(2) EPC 1973 (see T 861/02, T 897/03, T 276/04 and T 1309/05). [4]In its… [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 11:42 am
I don’t use social media for personal matters. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 3:01 pm
”Board 3.3.03 comes to another conclusion than Board 3.5.04 in T 689/05.A 113 / R 111[2] R 111(2) (corresponding to R 68(2) EPC 1973) requires that decisions of the EPO which are open to appeal shall be reasoned. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 5:01 pm
This problem was solved by the subject-matter according to present claim 8 comprising five groups of contrast agents, characterised by their affinity to either E-cadherin, CD44, P62/c-myc, p53 or EGFR/erB-2. [read post]
10 May 2011, 3:01 pm
Consequently, there is no obvious error which could be corrected under R 139. [read post]
