Search for: "MATTER OF T J B" Results 301 - 320 of 3,084
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jan 2016, 10:11 am by Ray Dowd
   Such preparation may include registering competing copyright claims for the same subject matter. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 2:01 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
 McGeveran: Coordination isn’t a matter of mere tidiness; need an independent reason to police the boundary. [read post]
1 Jan 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
Here the following applies: procedural acts that were legally effective for the proceedings (verfahrensgestaltend schon rechtswirksam) and completed (e.g. the time limit for filing an opposition (TFO)) before the entry into force of the EPC 2000 on December 13, 2007, are to be decided on the basis of the old law (J 10/07 [1]; T 1172/04 [1], tempus regit actum). [read post]
22 May 2014, 8:44 am
judgment in the case of Generics (UK) Ltd (t/a Mylan) v Richter Gedeon Vegyeszeti Gyar RT [2014] EWHC 1666 (Pat) (22 May 2014). [read post]
17 May 2023, 5:59 am by Caroline Schmitz
In AMG, the Court found that Section 13(b) of the FTC Act does not provide the Commission with the authority to obtain equitable monetary relief. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 2:28 pm by Patricia Hughes
In other words, the oath requirement does not completely deny the appellants’ right to express their views on the matter. [read post]
On 12 March 2021, Marcus Smith J handed down a formidable 42 page judgment on consequential matters (the “Consequentials Judgment”, a copy of which can be found here). [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 8:56 am by Rebecca Tushnet
”  (For what it’s worth, as a non-fan I couldn’t figure out which second this was.) [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 2:07 pm by Kelly Phillips Erb
No matter how intimidating it might be, always open the mail. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 1:42 pm
” [7] In both cases, the Court held that “because the text of Section 10(b) does not prohibit aiding and abetting … a private plaintiff may not maintain an aiding and abetting suit under 10(b). [read post]