Search for: "MGN"
Results 301 - 320
of 542
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jun 2016, 1:45 am
As established in John v MGN Ltd [1997] QB 586 general compensatory damages will compensate a claimant for the damage to his reputation; vindicate his name; and take account of the distress, hurt and humiliation which the defamatory publication has caused In assessing the level of damages to be awarded, the court will have regard to various factors, including: the gravity of the libel (the more seriously it touches the core attributes of the claimant’s personality the more serious it… [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 4:04 pm
Both Peck v United Kingdom (2003) 36 EHRR 41(in which in the moments preceding the claimant’s suicide attempt were caught on CCTV and broadcast on television) and Campbell v MGN Ltd [2004] UKHL 22 (where the defendant published photos of the claimant outside a Narcotics Anonymous meeting) have been cited with approval in New Zealand courts. [read post]
4 Apr 2010, 5:14 am
In the Courts There was an offer of amends assessment hearing in the case of Bowman v MGN. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 4:07 pm
Concerns regarding the uncertainty of the rule would appear to have been borne out in the first case decided in England and Wales under section 1 of the 2013 Act (Cooke v MGN). [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 12:26 am
In this case the Court seems to have taken a less stringent approach than it did in previous cases such as Cooke & Midland Hart v MGN [2014] EWHC 2831 (QB), in which it was held that serious harm could only be inferred in the most extreme of circumstances. [read post]
20 May 2015, 4:09 am
This builds on the cases of Campbell v MGN Ltd in the House of Lords and In re Guardian News and Media Ltd in the Supreme Court, that the right to convey information to the public includes the right to choose the language in which it is conveyed. [read post]
24 Jun 2018, 1:35 am
Finally, perhaps the most controversial feature of this claim was the decision at first instance that damages should not be assessed in line with Gulati & Ors and MGN Limited [2015] EWHC 1482 (Ch) (the facts of which concerned phone-hacking by journalists) in part because the privacy breach was accidental. [read post]
11 Sep 2011, 5:02 pm
Reserved Judgments The following reserved judgments after public hearings remain outstanding: Ferdinand v MGN, heard 4 to 6 July 2011 (Nicol J) WXY v Gewanter, heard 11-15, 18-19 July 2011 (Slade J) Commissioner of Police v Times Newspapers, heard 18-20 & 22 July 2011 (Tugendhat J) Morrison v Buckinghamshire CC, heard 20 to 21 July (HHJ Parkes QC) [read post]
Hong Kong: Freedom of the (Entertainment) Press: Part 1, Data Privacy and Public Interest – David Ma
22 Mar 2017, 5:29 pm
The House of Lords case Campbell v MGN Ltd [2004] 2 AC 457– where Naomi Campbell claimed the publication of her treatment at Narcotics Anonymous (“NA”) infringed her right to be respected for her private life under Article 8 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 1:00 am
On Tuesday 24 January until Thursday 26 January, the Supreme Court will hear the appeals of Times Newspapers Ltd v Flood; Miller v Associated Newspapers Ltd; and Frost & Ors v MGN Ltd. [read post]
28 Apr 2021, 1:37 am
The Court of Appeal’s reasoning was significantly impacted by its earlier ruling in Gulati v MGN Limited [2015] EWCA Civ 1291 that, in claims for the tort of misuse of private information, damages could flow from the misuse itself and that claimants were not required to show pecuniary loss or distress. [read post]
4 Jan 2015, 4:04 pm
On the basis of the approach taken by Bean J in Cooke v MGN ([2014] EWHC 2831 (QB)) it is difficult to see how this evidence could, of itself, satisfy the “seriousness” threshold in section 1. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 4:32 pm
Perhaps the best known example is the MGN/Naomi Campbell case in which privacy and costs issues got an intense scrutiny from the Strasbourg Court. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 12:18 am
Reserved Judgments The following reserved judgments after public hearings remain outstanding: Ferdinand v MGN, heard 4 to 6 July 2011 (Nicol J) WXY v Gewanter, heard 11-15, 18-19 July 2011 (Slade J) Commissioner of Police v Times Newspapers, heard 18-20 & 22 July 2011 (Tugendhat J) Morrison v Buckinghamshire CC, heard 20 to 21 July (HHJ Parkes QC) Share this:PrintEmailTwitterFacebookLike this:Be the first to like this post. [read post]
11 May 2015, 3:55 am
The tort of misuse of private information arose as a result of the recognition by the courts that “the values enshrined in Articles 8 and 10 [of the European Convention on Human Rights] are now part of the cause of action for breach of confidence” (Campbell v MGN [2004] 2 AC 457 [17]). [read post]
25 Aug 2012, 3:44 am
Lord Hope of Craighead provided such a definition in Campbell v MGN. [read post]
3 May 2015, 4:09 pm
Judgments The following reserved judgment in media law cases are outstanding: OPO v MLA, heard 19 and 20 January 2015 (UK Supreme Court) Murray v Associated Newspapers, heard 21 January 2015 (Longmore, Ryder and Sharp LJJ) Various Claimants v MGN, heard 9-13, 18, 24-25 March 2015 (Mann J). [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 2:00 am
Times Newspaper Ltd v Flood; Miller v Associated Newspapers Ltd; Frost & Ors v MGN Ltd, heard 24-26 January 2017. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 1:00 am
Times Newspaper Ltd v Flood; Miller v Associated Newspapers Ltd; Frost & Ors v MGN Ltd, heard 24-26 January 2017. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 4:09 pm
Made following the acceptance of an offer of amends made by the “Daily Mail”. 10.11.11 SIOC/11/1228 McCarthy v MGN Ltd. [read post]
