Search for: "MICHAEL v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE"
Results 301 - 320
of 1,367
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Mar 2020, 3:40 am
At Subscript Law, Michael Hollingsworth provides a graphic explainer. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 12:47 pm
” Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz is testifying before the House Committees on the Judiciary and Oversight and Government Reform on Tuesday, reports the Post. [read post]
16 Sep 2008, 9:58 pm
Bromfield v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 7:02 am
” Docket Number 11-398, Department of Health and Human Services v. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 5:55 am
Back to Court: The New York Law Journal reports that the U.S. [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 4:33 am
” At PrawfsBlawg, Michael Mannheimer wonders whether Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s opinion concurring in the judgment in part, in which she questioned the court’s unanimous 1996 holding in Whren v. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 2:47 pm
The problem is that Graham v. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 11:30 am
In the Pennsylvania case, Trump v. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 5:42 pm
Trustee Program in the Department of Justice. [read post]
28 May 2020, 1:18 pm
” HSBC, which was servicing Huawei at the time, had already “run afoul” of U.S. sanctions and had thus entered into a deferred prosecution agreement “with the US Department of Justice … in which it agreed not to commit further sanctions violations. [read post]
20 Apr 2022, 6:06 am
It thereby lifts liability without necessarily compelling cooperation, as Michael Becker flagged following the magistrate judge’s initial ruling in The Gambia v. [read post]
6 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
Howell shared an episode of the Lawfare Podcast in which Jurecic, Orpett, and Wittes sat down with Peter Strzok to discuss their recent Lawfare piece that outlines benchmarks for what to look for in the Justice Department's ongoing Jan. 6 investigation: Howell shared an episode of the Lawfare Podcast in which Jurecic sat down with Paul Rosenzweig to discuss the legal discipline process to hold lawyers who spread disinformation accountable: Eugene Linden argued that the… [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 8:13 am
It was filed by former U.S. [read post]
2 Mar 2019, 6:57 am
Eliot Kim summarized the Supreme Court’s ruling in Jam v. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 4:43 pm
The Justice Department urged the Supreme Court not to hear the case. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 11:37 am
Michael McConnell was kind enough to pass along some further thoughts about the Zubik v. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 2:46 pm
Indiana, No. 17-1091 (U.S. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 7:59 am
Summers and Michael J. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 1:22 pm
Menetrez, Michael C. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 6:37 am
At the Originalism Blog, Michael Ramsey offers a detailed analysis of Tuesday’s oral argument in Kiobel v. [read post]
