Search for: "MICHAEL v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE" Results 301 - 320 of 1,369
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Apr 2021, 10:38 am by Michael Lowe
” DOJ and DEA Releases: They Have Arrested a Lawyer Right now, what we know of this case comes from the initial filing and the accompanying news release by the Justice Department and Acting U.S. [read post]
22 Apr 2021, 6:28 pm by Steve Gottlieb
At the height of the Civil Rights Movement, the federal government brought the resources of the FBI and the Department of Justice to bear. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 8:01 am by William Ford, Victoria Gallegos
The subcommittee will hear testimony from Michael Horowitz, Justice Department inspector general. [read post]
19 Mar 2021, 12:30 pm by John Ross
Over at The Wall Street Journal, IJ Senior Attorney Michael Bindas explains why SCOTUS should grant cert in Carson v. [read post]
3 Mar 2021, 5:01 am by Julia Spiegel
Supreme Court’s 2006 decision in Massachusetts v. [read post]
2 Mar 2021, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
They relied on the 1997 decision in Edmond v. [read post]
24 Feb 2021, 10:56 am by Jacob Schulz
The Justice Department uses the firearms charge pretty regularly. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 11:53 am by Philip Bobbitt
That is the nature of this modality of argument in U.S. constitutional construction. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Former Mueller Prosecutor Predicts Increased Pursuit of Unregistered Foreign Agents Politico – Caitlin Oprysko and Josh Gerstein | Published: 2/4/2021 Brandon Van Grack, the Justice Department official who spearheaded the department’s crackdown on unregistered foreign agents praised the department’s tougher approach to enforcing the Foreign Agent Registration Act (FARA) and predicted the department will continue the crackdown… [read post]
7 Feb 2021, 4:53 pm by INFORRM
Neville, York University – Department of Communications. [read post]
2 Feb 2021, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Thus, earlier this week and with the plaintiffs’ consent, the Department of Justice asked the Court to hold the case in abeyance.Despite the high likelihood that the Supreme Court will not hear Trump v. [read post]