Search for: "Mark L"
Results 301 - 320
of 13,038
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jun 2009, 9:00 pm
Further on the defendant was marketing these imitations by using L’Oréal ´s wordmarks in a comparison price list. [read post]
6 May 2021, 10:20 am
Mark A. [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 10:06 am
With deep sadness we share the news of the passing of Ronald L. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 2:56 am
Read comments and post your comment here.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 3:26 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
6 Sep 2020, 9:15 am
Int’l. [read post]
29 Sep 2008, 8:00 am
Mark Tushnet's Thurgood Marshall and the Rule of Law is an essay recently posted on SSRN by yours truly, Mary L. [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 12:53 pm
This year marks our 18th Annual... [read post]
16 Nov 2006, 6:10 pm
Copyright © 2006 the International Trademark Association, and reprinted with permission from The Trademark Reporter ®, 96 TMR 1101 (September-October 2006).Text Copyright John L. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 4:48 am
This case was of particular interest not only because it applied the ECJ's guidance in L'Oreal v Bellure but also because it most notably introduced the German concept of "trade mark parodies" to Austrian trade mark law. [read post]
10 May 2008, 12:24 pm
The scope of the comparative law day is marked in its title: [...] [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 4:02 am
Seems like opposer is just as happy with a finding of no likelihood of confusion.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 3:23 am
Tiger Lily rolled the dice on abandonment and came up with snake eyes.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 3:12 am
In other words, the literal portion and the question mark are entwined, and therefore Applicant's drawing depicting GOT STRAPS is not a substantially exact representation of the mark as usedin commerce.TTABlog comment: I still disagree with the UPPER 90 decision.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 3:45 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
15 Aug 2014, 1:24 am
We are approaching the fifth anniversary of the post-Bose "no fraud" era, and this case might have opened the door.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
7 Apr 2017, 3:05 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
10 May 2017, 2:29 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 4:00 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
7 Mar 2018, 3:23 am
Conclusion: Confusion is likely, and so the Board affirmed the Section 2(d) refusal.Read comments and post your comment here.TTABlog comment: Not exactly a hare-raising decision.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
