Search for: "Mark Strong"
Results 301 - 320
of 10,757
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jan 2024, 3:46 am
In fact, likelihood of confusion 'is to be avoided as much between weak marks as between strong marks. [read post]
21 Feb 2020, 2:58 am
As to the strength of the GARANIMAL mark, ultimately the Board found the marks to be “commercially strong, but not famous. [read post]
24 Jun 2008, 10:34 pm
” The lesson in this case for mark owners is, if you want a strong brand, resist incorporating terms that are generic into a brand. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 4:00 pm
OMS Investments argued that a marks incontestable status does not necessarily make a weak mark strong. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 5:38 am
In a 71-page opinion, the Board sustained a Section 2(d) opposition to registration of the mark BRUCE WINSTON for gemstones and fine jewelry, finding the mark likely to cause confusion with the mark HARRY WINSTON and the registered mark WINSTON for jewelry. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 3:09 am
The post <strong>Key Takeaways from NLRB Decision Related to Displaying Black Lives Matter Symbol on Work Uniforms</strong> appeared first on HR Daily Advisor. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 3:09 am
The post <strong>Key Takeaways from NLRB Decision Related to Displaying Black Lives Matter Symbol on Work Uniforms</strong> appeared first on HR Daily Advisor. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 12:47 pm
You require a strong advocate. [read post]
15 Mar 2022, 4:13 am
The Board found opposer's mark to be conceptually weak but commercially strong.] [read post]
6 Sep 2017, 3:33 am
Nevertheless, the Board found MIDNIGHT VELVET to be commercially strong, though not famous.Turning to the sixth du Pont factor, the record included 40 third-party registrations for marks containing the word VELVET in connection with clothing, jewelry, or retail clothing store services. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 2:48 am
Here it is especially true that these design elements merely serve as carriers for the words and do not themselves have any strong source-identifying significance.Comparing the marks as a whole, consumers are likely to focus on the surname HUGHES and will mistakenly believe that the goods emanate from the same source. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 6:02 am
Even after his death the Knut brand was still going strong as evidenced by Bloomberg Business Week's article "140 million dollar polar bear Knut." [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 12:44 pm
To succeed in its claim of trademark infringement, Louboutin has to show that its Red Sole Mark merits protection and YSL’s use of the same or similar mark is likely to confuse the consumers as to the origin of the shoes. [read post]
31 Dec 2020, 10:20 am
Also, the faith of three-dimensional marks appears rather unfortunate and may provide for significant hurdles for trade mark holders to overcome. [read post]
24 Oct 2006, 12:46 pm
"We believe the evidence was strong [...] [read post]
17 Feb 2021, 4:23 am
The Board found the TINDER mark to be "very strong" for likelihood of confusion purposes, but not famous for purposes of dilution. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 4:46 am
The lesson for Opposers, once again, is this: take the time and make the effort to prove that your mark is as strong as possible. [read post]
2 Nov 2019, 2:53 am
The Brussels court accepted that the Dom Pérignon trade marks enjoy a strong reputation and, as far as the sales of clothes were concerned, were infringed by Mr Peers. [read post]
4 Jan 2023, 1:14 pm
The post <strong>TTAB Sustains Opposition Based on Applicant’s Failure to Secure the Consent of a Living Individual</strong> appeared first on The Brand Protection Blog. [read post]
4 Jan 2023, 1:14 pm
The post <strong>TTAB Sustains Opposition Based on Applicant’s Failure to Secure the Consent of a Living Individual</strong> appeared first on The Brand Protection Blog. [read post]
