Search for: "Mark v. Mark"
Results 301 - 320
of 34,421
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
In 2024, we mark the 70th anniversary of this historic decision by looking back on the case’s procedural history and sharing the resources available at the Library of Congress for further research. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 2:37 am
Even if you are in the right when you file a lawsuit against a former employee who admittedly took your trade secrets, sometimes the reward is simply not worth the expense. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 11:27 am
Another multi-district litigation (MDL) has hit a jarring speed bump. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 10:42 am
Little V. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 7:02 am
EDT, the justices will hear oral argument in Moyle v. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 5:57 am
” Mark Esper, Trump’s former defense secretary, has warned of “more … hyper-aggressive behavior” by Trump if he takes office, recounting when Trump asked if demonstrators gathering around the White House following the death of George Floyd could be shot. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 1:52 am
It marks the first time the Supreme Court has considered a state ban since Roe was reversed. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 12:36 pm
Supreme Court’s 1938 decision in Erie Railroad Co. v. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 8:04 am
The recent Supreme Court decision in Muldrow v. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 6:24 am
The case is Organi Mark (Pty) Ltd v Goolam Nabi Ebrahim Akoodie and Another (240/2023) [2024] ZASCA 44 (8 April 2024). [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 6:24 am
The case is Organi Mark (Pty) Ltd v Goolam Nabi Ebrahim Akoodie and Another (240/2023) [2024] ZASCA 44 (8 April 2024). [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 6:28 pm
PLF attorney Mark Miller (author of the brief) has a helpful summary in a recent Fox News article. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 2:16 pm
See Sage Therapeutics, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 10:01 am
Trial in The People of the State of New York vs. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 8:30 am
This marks the first time the Court has invited the silcrow—better known as the “section symbol” (§). [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
Inst. v. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 4:28 am
Although summary judgment is not appropriate in a malpractice action where the parties submit conflicting expert opinions, “expert opinions that are conclusory, speculative, or unsupported by the record are insufficient to raise triable issues of fact” (Longhi v Lewit, 187 AD3d 873, 877 [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Lowe v Japal, 170 AD3d 701, 702). [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 4:23 am
Hostess Brands, LLC v. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 2:42 pm
In BBK Tobacco & Foods LLP v. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 9:27 am
For more information on SEC v. [read post]