Search for: "Marks v. USA" Results 301 - 320 of 1,899
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jul 2020, 3:42 am by Edith Roberts
Court-watchers are focusing on Espinoza v. [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 3:47 am by Edith Roberts
” Yesterday the Supreme Court ruled in Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
Accordingly, the appellate court vacated the preliminary injunction to the extent that it enjoined the sale of products that the mark owner chose not to buy back, and it remanded the case for reexamination of which product lines were covered by the injunction (Really Good Stuff, LLC v. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 3:42 am by Edith Roberts
” At Education Week, Mark Walsh looks at how changes to the qualified immunity doctrine might affect public school educators. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 3:34 am by Family Law
From USA Today: June 12 is Loving Day, a celebration marking the day the Supreme Court struck down state bans against interracial marriage. [read post]
While the plaintiff’s filing of an application to register the SULKA mark in the United States was “certainly relevant” to intent to market products in the United States, it had little bearing on his ability to expand his business to the United States (Selah v. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 3:59 am by Edith Roberts
This blog’s analysis of Monday’s decision in GE Energy Power Conversion v. [read post]
27 May 2020, 6:31 am by David Kris
In April 2020, the State Department designated the Russian Imperial Movement (RIM) as a terrorist group, marking the “first time the United States has ever designated white supremacist terrorists. [read post]
18 May 2020, 6:05 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” (Macquarie Capital [USA] Inc. v Morrison & Foerster LLP, 157 AD3d 456, 457 [1st Dept 2018].) [read post]
11 May 2020, 8:07 am by Dan Maurer
Though this would mark an enormous sea change in historical practice, it gets the U.S. better aligned with most of its allies’ military systems. [read post]
The district court did not err in determining that the evidence did not establish that the San Diego Comic Convention marks were generic. [read post]
11 May 2020, 3:24 am by Edith Roberts
The first is McGirt v. [read post]
6 May 2020, 3:49 am by Edith Roberts
Patent and Trademark Office v. [read post]