Search for: "Marriage of Olson"
Results 301 - 320
of 379
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Dec 2009, 11:44 am
According to the same-sex marriage side, Prop 8 supporters want to call Young as an expert on what universally constitutes marriage and why. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 12:43 am
†12/08/09 KTUV.com / Bay City News: Proposition 8 supporters in an opposing trial brief claimed there are numerous reasons for a traditional definition of marriage. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 7:38 am
Aside from the naturally high-profile nature of the suit - the constitutionality of same-sex marriage - the case had other fascinating little wrinkles. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 9:30 am
" 12/04/09 Wall Street Journal Law Blog: In October, Walker ruled that Boies, Olson et. al were entitled to see see the internal memos and e-mails between Yes on 8 strategists to look for evidence that the campaign had sought to exploit anti-gay bias. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 12:57 am
Stanton is director of family formation studies at Focus on the Family and the author of Marriage on Trial: The Case Against Same-Sex Marriage and Parenting. [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 9:18 am
In the lawsuit, same-sex couples represented by former Solicitor General Ted Olson and star appellate litigator David Boies are claiming that the enactment of Prop 8 violated the federal constitutional rights of LGBT Californians. [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 7:12 am
Adam Liptak at the New York Times covers the continuing legal battle over gay marriage, and in particular the lawsuit - filed by former Solicitor General Ted Olson - pending before U.S. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 4:00 am
Olson could count on, Professor Koppelman said, "I have trouble getting to one. [read post]
18 Oct 2009, 12:10 pm
Before the hearing, Olson talked with Chronicle staff writer Bob Egelko about the case. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 1:41 pm
Nelson, a 1972 Minnesota Supreme Court decision denying a same-sex marriage claim that the Supreme Court refused to review on the ground that it presented no substantial federal question, a federal trial court is precedent-bound to reject any federal constitutional claim for same-sex marriage. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 4:27 pm
District Judge Vaughn Walker, ruled today in San Francisco refusing to grant a motion to dismiss the legal challenge to Prop 8 brought by former Solicitor General Ted Olson and trial lawyer David Boies. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 12:33 pm
Same-sex-marriage attorney Theodore Olson of Gibson Dunn & Crutcher was quick to reinforce Walker's doubts. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 3:03 pm
Backers of the anti-marriage amendment will argue in court Wednesday that a... [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 2:47 pm
Solicitor General Theodore Olson and trial lawyer David Boies sued to overturn Proposition 8. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 1:41 pm
The challenge to Prop 8 is being brought by a legal team that includes former Solicitor General Ted Olson and trial lawyer David Boies. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 12:01 am
Welcome to Blawg Review 233. [read post]
9 Oct 2009, 2:27 pm
" Its enactment put an end to new same-sex marriages in California, although the state Supreme Court ruled that marriages contracted prior to that enactment remained valid. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 5:56 am
09/24/09 National Review / ADF Alliance Alert:Law professor Nelson Lund faults attorneys Theodore Olson and David Boies for their reliance in the Perry case on three central precedents to argue that bans on same-sex marriage violate the equal protection and due process clauses of the 14th Amendment. [read post]
26 Sep 2009, 1:39 am
On September 23rd, Theodore Olson and Therese Stewart filed a joint opposition to the motion for plaintiffs and plaintiff-intervenor, the City and County of San Francisco.Rick Xiao is a California attorney and a regular commentator on this blog. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 5:46 am
Gordon, Marriage proposal: Prop 8 suit goes federal, and that worries same-sex marriage advocates, ABA Journal, Sept 2009, at 18.Gordon reports comments by Theodore Olson and Charles Cooper, former colleagues in the Reagen Justice Department, but now attorneys on opposing sides in Perry v. [read post]
