Search for: "Marshall v. WE Marshall Co." Results 301 - 320 of 757
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
In our 2011 ACLU report on secrecy "Drastic Measures Required," my co-author Mike German and I wrote that "American democracy has a disease, and it's called secrecy. [read post]
28 Aug 2018, 8:13 am by Carolyn Shapiro
The year before Harlan’s nomination the Supreme Court decided Brown v. [read post]
7 May 2009, 11:35 pm
Gerald Neuman and Harold Koh, among others, responded to Bradley and Goldsmith (Koh had been co-counsel in numerous human rights cases, including Kadic v. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 5:31 am by Melissa Stewart
The draft resolution has 105 co-sponsors (more than half the U.N. member states) and is all but guaranteed to pass. [read post]
14 May 2020, 7:15 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
" Id. at 1486 (quoting Walsh, supra, at 777); see Walsh, supra, at 757 (noting that Chief Justice Marshall in Marbury v. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  The fact that we have single-member districts is the result of an 1842 law passed by Congress, that made good sense at the time, coupled with its reaffirmation by a later law passed in the 1960s. [read post]