Search for: "Massachusetts v. EPA"
Results 301 - 320
of 720
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jun 2011, 1:20 pm
You may remember that, three Terms ago, the Court decided Massachusetts v. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 2:13 pm
Supreme Court opinion in Massachusetts v. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 1:07 pm
Specifically, the Court stated the displacement test as simply “whether the statute speaks directly to the question at issue,” and that in this case, Massachusetts v. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 8:52 am
The industry had hoped to limit the Court’s standing holding in Massachusetts v. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 5:28 am
First, the opinion, before reaching the merits, states that 4 votes (without Justice Sotomayor weighing in) remain in support of Massachusetts v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 2:39 pm
This issue was addressed in the Massachusetts v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 2:19 pm
Justice Ginsburg – part of the five-member majority in Massachusetts v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 12:10 pm
I suppose that the extra displacement aspect of the statute would make that statute a somewhat heavier political lift, but if the Republicans can get rid of Massachusetts v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 11:31 am
” The Court did, however, reinforce the legal conclusion that it had drawn three years ago (in the case of Massachusetts v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 11:13 am
EPA), and Justice Alito wrote separately, joined by Justice Thomas, to emphasize that his decision rested on the assumption that the Clean Air Act applied to carbon dioxide emissions (the position he rejected in Massachusetts v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 10:57 am
Indeed, this outcome was clearly compelled by applicable precedent given the Court’s prior holding, in Massachusetts v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 10:51 am
The Court noted that in Massachusetts v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 7:56 am
The Supreme Court rejected the Bush position in a landmark 2007 case called Massachusetts v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 7:45 am
EPA interpreted the Clean Air Act correctly. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 7:43 am
This part of the opinion strongly reaffirms the holding in Massachusetts v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 7:42 am
Not surprisingly, the Court found in a 8-0 opinion that EPA’s authority to regulate greenhouse gases under the Clean Air Act, affirmed by the Court in Massachusetts v EPA, “displaces” any federal common law nuisance claim for interstate air pollution resulting in climate change. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 4:15 am
It simply held that the Clean Air Act gives EPA the authority to consider GHG regulations,and the Court’s earlier ruling in Massachusetts v. [read post]
4 Jun 2011, 2:37 pm
Yet such regulation is clearly authorized, if not required, by the Supreme Court’s decision in Massachusetts v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 6:38 am
But it lost some of its footing with the Supreme Court's 2007 ruling in Massachusetts v. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 6:48 am
EPA, No. 10-1031). [read post]
