Search for: "Matter of A.D" Results 301 - 320 of 1,064
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jun 2018, 6:30 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The jury resolved this credibility determination in plaintiff's favor (see Laham v Bin Chambi, 34 AD3d 374, 375, 824 N.Y.S.2d 641 [1st Dept 2006]).Based on our review of the record, defendant's request for a reduction of the compensatory damages award is without merit.Plaintiff did not object to the trial court's refusal to charge punitive damages, and therefore did not preserve the issue for review (see CPLR 4110-b; Washington v Atenco, 103 A.D.3d 529, 529, 959 N.Y.S.2d… [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 6:00 am by Rick St. Hilaire
These protections are authorized by the Convention on Cultural Property Implementation Act (CPIA), the federal law that gives effect to the 1970 UNESCO Convention on the Means of Prohibiting and Preventing the Illicit Import, Export and Transfer of Ownership of Cultural Property.The MoU renewal under consideration covers artifacts dating from 75,000 B.C. through 907 A.D., as well as monumental and wall art 250+ years old.The Cultural Property Advisory Committee (CPAC) will hold a public… [read post]
The court therefore found, “as a matter of New York contract law, [that] the policies are unambiguous on the allocation issue and that summary judgment is warranted” for the policyholder. [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 4:08 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Boies, Schiller & Flexner LLP, 140 A.D.3d 587, 587 (1st Dept. 2016). [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 12:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
If the employee objects to the content of such communications, he or she may sue the employer and the individuals involved for defamation, claiming the contents of the communications concerning his or her behavior constitutes slander [if oral] or libel [if written].The individuals being sued for defamation in such cases will often respond that the statements they made in such communications are privileged and thus they are immune from liability for their actions.In Herlihy v Metropolitan Museum of… [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 12:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
[Allman v Koehler, 161 A.D.2d 114]Dismissal of a 17-year employee who failed to report her intended absence on two occasions. [read post]
4 Feb 2018, 9:01 pm by Neil Cahn
Accordingly, the matter was remitted for immediate recalculation of the husband’s temporary child support obligation. [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 2:54 pm by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
., 61 A.D.3d 62 (1st Dept. 2009), so I wonder if this is the first time the Second Department has ruled this way. [read post]
15 Oct 2017, 10:01 pm by Barry Barnett
Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis LLP, 142 A.D.3d 210, 216 35 N.Y.S.3d 31, 35 (1st Dept. 2017); In re Texas Health Resources, 472 S.W.3d 895, 901-02 (Tex. [read post]