Search for: "Matter of Clark v Clark" Results 301 - 320 of 1,890
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Dec 2020, 9:56 am by Eleonora Rosati
As discussed elsewhere, trade mark law struggles with shapes almost to the point of only pretending to offer them protection.But who cares about trade marks, or designs for that matter, if your creation can readily achieve copyright protection. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
It remains to be seen how the COVID-19 pandemic will influence jury awards.Stay of Civil Litigation Matters Pending Result of Criminal CaseIn a case of first impression handed down in March in the matter of Keesee v. [read post]
6 Dec 2020, 12:45 pm by Giles Peaker
Bromford Housing Association Ltd v Nightingale (2020) EWHC 2648 (QB) An application for relief from sanctions by the defendant to file a late witness statement by a homeless officer in a possession claim was rightly refused by the first instance judge as the matters adressed in the statement were self-evident. [read post]
23 Nov 2020, 6:19 am by Matt Cooper
A Clark County District Court Judge denied the plaintiffs’ motion. [read post]
22 Nov 2020, 3:47 am
 Jane LambertIntellectual Property Enterprise Court (HH Judge Melissa Clarke) Communisis Plc v The TALL Group of Companies Ltd and others [2020] EWHC 3089 (IPEC) (17 Nov 2020)This was a claim for patent infringement and a counterclaim for revocation on grounds of obviousness and excluded matter. [read post]
21 Nov 2020, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
Clarke v Nursing and Midwifery Council of New South Wales [2020] NSWDC 641 Scotting DCJ dismissed claims for libel based on an email and other matters. [read post]
17 Nov 2020, 11:15 am by Alex Woolgar
This proposition is - again - uncontroversial in light of Douglas v Hello!. [read post]
1 Nov 2020, 4:35 pm by INFORRM
In Clarke v Nursing and Midwifery Council of New South Wales [2020] NSWDC 641 Scotting DCJ dismissed claims for libel based on an email and other matters. [read post]
17 Oct 2020, 3:35 pm by Eugene Volokh
Justice Dirk Sandefur's majority opinion (jointed by Justices Laurie McKinnon, Beth Baker, and Ingrid Gustafson) in State v. [read post]