Search for: "Matter of Dept. of Insurance's Order"
Results 301 - 320
of 434
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Mar 2010, 10:49 am
Lou Solomon became co-chair of the lit dept in ‘05 or thereabouts. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 6:48 am
Allstate Ins. (2nd Dept., decided 3/16/2010) Commercial landlord L&B Estates leased Brooklyn premises to tenant 21st Century Achievers. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 7:53 am
Co. (1st Dept., decided 3/23/2010) Two years after answering plaintiffs' complaint, defendant Otsego Mutual Fire Insurance Company moved for leave to amend its answer to assert a fraud affirmative defense and for summary judgment based on that defense. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 5:58 am
In AFFIRMING the lower court's order granting summary judgment to Merchants, the Fourth Department held: "Where[, as here,] the provisions of an insurance contract are clear and unambiguous, they must be enforced as written' " (Oot v Home Ins. [read post]
20 Mar 2010, 4:38 am
Now a Court has ordered that an insurance company must treat a persons obesity as an extension of its medical benefits so that weight reduction can occur and the underlying work related condition can be addressed. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 6:27 am
In this case, the insured's failure to obtain a copy of the related police report was found, as a matter of law, to show a lack of reasonable inquiry. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 6:03 am
Co. (2nd Dept., decided 3/9/2010) The earth movement exclusion found in the standard Causes of Loss--Special Form, ISO endorsement number CP 10 30 10 00, of a commercial property insurance policy provides, in part: B. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 4:09 am
Lowney was appointed by the New York State Department of Labor to serve as an Administrative Law Judge for the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 12:16 pm
Furboter (3rd Dept., decided 3/2/2010) The insured did not notify petitioner, Tri-State Consumer Insurance Company, of his supplementary uninsured motorists (SUM) coverage claim until 16 months after the accident. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 9:07 pm
Therefore, the 3d Dept. erred in precluding the carrier's previously uninvoked exclusions. [read post]
20 Feb 2010, 6:13 am
Co., 242 AD2d 663 [2d Dept. 1997]). [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 8:56 am
The Fourth Department further held that Lexington's disclaimer, issued after Lexington's investigation of the matter and within four weeks of its first notice of the accident and underlying action, was timely as a matter of law. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 8:46 am
Matter of American Alternative Ins. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 6:33 am
Lawson (2nd Dept., decided 2/2/2010) Can an insurer be sued for defamation in relation to statements it makes about the insured or claimant while it is investigating whether or after it has concluded that the claim is fraudulent? [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 6:02 am
AUTO – "QUALIFIED PERSON" – DIRECT ACTION AGAINST MVAIC – INSURANCE LAW § 5218 Matter of Vega v. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 2:32 pm
Co., 36 AD3d 840, 842 (2d Dept. 2007). [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 6:49 am
Co. (2nd Dept., decided 1/5/2010) There's nothing particularly surprising about this plaintiff and its counsel taking a default judgment on the earliest possible day against a no-fault insurer defendant. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 10:36 am
In REVERSING the lower court's order, the Second Department ruled that the evidence presented at the hearing established that the respondent did not reside in her mother's household at the time of the accident and, thus, was not a covered person under the subject policy: A person's status as a resident of an insured's household "requires something more than temporary or physical presence and requires at least some degree of permanence and intention to… [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 11:20 am
Co. (2nd Dept., decided 12/22/2009) New York case law is legion, as they say, that a liability insurer's non-compliance with New York Insurance Law § 3420(d)(2) can excuse the insured's breach of the policy's notice condition. [read post]
18 Jan 2010, 9:24 pm
Co. (2nd Dept., decided 1/12/2010) New York property insurers better sit up and pay attention to this decision. [read post]
