Search for: "Matter of Kern"
Results 301 - 320
of 374
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Sep 2016, 8:00 am
In Los Angeles County they are located in Inglewood, Long Beach, Torrance, Compton, Downey, Pasadena, Pomona, Sylmar, East Los Angeles, and Bakersfield for cases in Kern County. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 4:31 pm
Kern County Board of Supervisors (2017) 17 Cal.App.5th 708, also addressed important CEQA baseline and railroad operation preemption issues. [read post]
9 Feb 2022, 5:00 am
In fact, when San Joaquin Community Hospital (now Adventist Health) established a burn center to help Bakersfield and Kern County residents in need of specialized burn care, the law firm’s partners donated $200,000 toward the center and it was named the Chain | Cohn | Stiles Burn Center. [read post]
Study: Number of people killed by red light runners hits a 10-year high (and how to prevent crashes)
20 Nov 2019, 6:00 am
——— If you or someone you know is injured in an accident at the fault of a red-light runner, or injured on the job no matter whose fault it is, contact the attorneys at Chain | Cohn | Stiles by calling (661) 323-4000, or fill out a free consultation form at chainlaw.com. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 4:35 pm
The firm has expertise in all real property matters, including full-service litigation and dispute resolution services, transactions, acquisitions, dispositions, leasing, construction, management, title insurance, environmental law, and redevelopment and land use. [read post]
16 Feb 2021, 2:14 pm
” ——— If you or someone you know is injured in an accident at the fault of someone else, or injured on the job no matter whose fault it is, contact the attorneys at Chain | Cohn | Stiles by calling (661) 323-4000, or fill out a free consultation form at chainlaw.com. [read post]
14 Mar 2023, 11:20 am
The SPB rejected the argument that in matters of multiple acts of misconduct, the initiation of the investigation into one act triggers the one year limitations period for all acts of misconduct. [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 8:00 am
Kern County and Shasta County have even voted against use. [read post]
14 Mar 2020, 3:46 am
Kern, Lizbeth González. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 8:49 am
Kern County Bd. of Supervisors (2017) 17 Cal.App.5th 708 at page 752, blogged on here.) [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 3:19 pm
Kern County Board of Supervisors (2017) _____ Cal.App.5th _____ (“AIR”), my post on which can be found here. [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 6:00 am
While asbestos claims are not unheard of in Kern, Yoro said, those related to valley fever are more common here. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 6:36 am
As an initial matter, the court dismissed the claims against the school board because it was not a separate entity and the claims against it were duplicative of the claims against the district. [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 8:00 am
Kern County and Shasta County have even voted against use. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 7:00 am
Therefore, a new German law containing matter inconsistent with Union law would raise only a conflict with a simple law, not with the Constitution. [read post]
24 Jan 2007, 6:15 pm
Kern [Respondent's president], as a layperson, to believe that [Respondent's] activities constituted use of the MAID TO ORDER mark in interstate commerce. *** This belief is sufficient to negate an inference of fraud upon the USPTO in obtaining and maintaining the registration. [read post]
11 Aug 2009, 11:22 pm
District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana 2009): [Kern Carver Bernard] Wilson was convicted by a jury . . . of Counts 1 and 4 of the four-count indictment. . . . [read post]
23 Sep 2008, 11:42 am
" Similarly, in Bailey v Kern, 177 Misc 904, the Court said that it did not have the power to command an appointing authority to fill a vacancy because the discretion to make appointments is vested in the appointing authority. [read post]
19 May 2022, 1:00 am
In 2011, four supervisors at West Kern Water District in California decided to follow up a staff training on responding to robberies with a fake holdup. [read post]
16 Mar 2009, 4:15 am
It is the function of the administrative agency or the Hearing Officer, not the reviewing court, to weigh the evidence or assess the credibility of witnesses and determine which testimony to accept and which to reject.Concluding that the District's determination was " supported by substantial evidence," the Appellate Division sustained the penalty imposed by the District, commenting that "the imposed penalty of dismissal was not so disproportionate to the offense as to be… [read post]
