Search for: "Matter of Kerr v Kerr"
Results 301 - 320
of 878
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Feb 2023, 1:18 pm
" Whitman v. [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 2:18 am
These are not matters about which he can have had any reasonable expectation of privacy. [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 12:40 am
Also in the Supreme Court this week is the matter of HMRC v Loyalty Management UK Ltd, listed for Wednesday 24 until Thursday 25 October 2012. [read post]
25 Dec 2013, 9:59 pm
(Orin Kerr) A recent case, United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 8:23 pm
Last week, in Mitchell v. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 12:12 pm
On Tuesday of this week, the en banc Eleventh Circuit will hear oral argument in United States v. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 8:35 am
Importantly as Lord Neuberger expressly recognized at [69] (in agreement with Lord Kerr) the Court of Appeal were wrong to confine themselves to the question “whether the decision-maker had approached the matter rationally, lawfully and in a procedurally correct manner”. [read post]
7 Apr 2020, 2:48 am
It was simply a matter of common sense. [read post]
7 Oct 2016, 12:42 pm
See Arizona v. [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 1:00 am
In the matter of C (Children), heard 9-10 Oct 2017. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 5:36 pm
Notably, Payton v. [read post]
28 Jan 2018, 5:39 pm
(As the Court stated in Kerr [v. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 1:33 am
The appeal was heard by a five justice panel of Lady Hale and Lords Phillips, Kerr, Clarke and Reed. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 8:08 am
It is for Lords Phillips, Brown and Kerr to determine whether there is an automatic right to appeal. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 6:06 am
” The Volokh Conspiracy’s Orin Kerr responds, noting that “[n]o matter what Supreme Court opinions look like, there will always be someone who criticizes them for not being clear enough. [read post]
24 May 2017, 1:57 pm
Knotts and United States v. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 7:30 am
From that perspective, the odd part about Hernandez v. [read post]
25 Nov 2017, 6:12 am
U.S., Orin Kerr argued that the Fourth Amendment does not guarantee a general right to be secure from government surveillance. [read post]
14 May 2020, 1:13 am
Please refresh the UKSC Blog homepage throughout the day in order to get the latest posts. 1426: As we bring this Live Blog to a close, we all eagerly await the UK Supreme Court’s judgment in this important matter. [read post]
23 May 2011, 8:44 am
This was the riddle that recently occupied a nine-judge panel of the Supreme Court in R (Adams) v Secretary of State for Justice [2011] UKSC 18. [read post]
