Search for: "Matter of Kerr v Kerr"
Results 301 - 320
of 878
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Sep 2016, 11:09 am
Facebook v. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 7:42 am
But why does that analogy matter? [read post]
5 Aug 2016, 9:38 am
In Burrows v. [read post]
30 Jul 2016, 2:11 pm
We have seen the Northern Irish Supreme Court Justice Lord Kerr suggesting that Article 3 of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child ought to be directly applicable, and the Supreme Court applying it in Mathieson v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2015] UKSC 47 (8 July 2015). [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 7:30 am
And with the Ninth Circuit's decision on July 5 in United States v. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 6:07 pm
Diaz v. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 6:07 pm
Diaz v. [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 4:03 am
After the 9th Circuit’s en banc ruling in United States v. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 4:32 pm
Here’s a rundown of the case and why it matters. [read post]
6 Jul 2016, 9:05 pm
Should it matter whether the plaintiffs are sympathetic terror victims? [read post]
6 Jul 2016, 5:28 am
Kerr, Computer Crime Law 48 (3d ed. 2013). [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 9:09 am
Kerr v. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 4:45 am
Now the US Supreme Court in a case styled Utah v. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 3:56 am
Orin refers to Brown v. [read post]
31 May 2016, 4:11 am
In the en banc majority opinion, the name “Kerr” appeared 13 times. [read post]
19 May 2016, 1:23 pm
Marbury v. [read post]
6 May 2016, 10:50 am
If everyone in power is corrupt, after all, politics no longer matters. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 11:39 am
The judge reasoned that:“…the infringement of a trade mark is at stake, which by its nature implies some urgency, as ‘The life of a trade mark depends on the promptitude with which it is vindicated…’ (Kerr on Injunctions 363, quoted in Tullen Industries Ltd v A de Souza Costa (Pty) Ltd 1976 (4) SA 220 (W) 220B). [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 5:34 am
See United States v. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 7:50 am
Moreover, as Chief Justice Marshall noted in Marbury v. [read post]
