Search for: "Matter of M C B"
Results 301 - 320
of 3,529
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Nov 2018, 9:45 am
c) etc.? [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 11:33 am
They perform well b/c they’re good at doing the task. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 3:09 am
M. [read post]
5 May 2017, 6:14 am
Determining the Likely Standard of Review in Delaware M&A Transactions Posted by Robert B. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 10:10 am
The matter shown in broken lines is not part of the mark. [read post]
13 Aug 2009, 6:07 am
The legal pages in today’s Times turns to an unlikely area of law (that is, unlikely to be covered in those pages, which usually track the ups and downs of various, more conventional matters of English law). [read post]
20 Oct 2013, 7:19 am
I’m not (a) saying that this was Cruz’s plan, or the GOP’s plan (and indeed it likely wasn’t on their minds); (b) defending Cruz or GOP strategy on the merits; or (c) praising Cruz or defending him from his detractors in general. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 2:16 pm
After writing months’ worth of columns for Size Matters, I now consider myself somewhat of a career coach for small-firm attorneys. [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 2:06 pm
Decentralizes authorship: the work becomes what’s important b/c it spreads, decontextualized. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 8:09 am
In its opposition, the FTC noted that “the FTC has already ceased its pursuit of monetary relief in this matter. [read post]
1 Sep 2014, 9:01 pm
Bartz, Joe M. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 10:31 am
The case is Father M v. [read post]
28 Sep 2018, 6:52 am
The court correctly says third party content is relevant only to 230(c)(1), not 230(c)(2)(B). [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 9:01 pm
I’m going to let America default unless Congress does something that they don’t want to do. [read post]
26 May 2017, 1:39 pm
C. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 1:52 pm
Although it is correct in law to say that the 26 week statutory provisions brought in by C&FA 2014 do not apply specifically to placement applications, it is wrong in reality to say that 26 weeks doesn’t apply to placement proceedings. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 10:16 am
., No.3:15-cv-1026-M, 2015 WL 8010920 (N.D. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 1:35 pm
If that's the case, I'm extremely disappointed in the administration by dealing with the matter in such an authoritarian way. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 1:00 am
R v M; R v C; R v T, heard 19 Jun 2017. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 3:05 pm
In a recent memorandum opinion, Chief Judge Gregory M. [read post]
