Search for: "Matter of Ortiz" Results 301 - 320 of 406
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
 That 2005 Act introduced a new requirement under 11 USC 522 for all debtors–that a debtor may not use the exemptions of the state in which they live, unless the debtor has resided in that state for 730 days, as explained by my colleague, Nicholas Ortiz. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 3:35 am
**For the full text of the decision, go to:http://nypublicpersonnellawarchives.blogspot.com/2007/02/no-right-to-name-clearing-hearing.html* The “New York Rule” in such situations is discussed in Ortiz v Ward, 546 NYS2d 624. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 4:12 pm by justia
Hoping to generate a steady income stream, he signed up to handle federal appeals for indigent criminal defendants, but then learned that getting paid in these matters took months or years. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 4:12 pm by justia
Hoping to generate a steady income stream, he signed up to handle federal appeals for indigent criminal defendants, but then learned that getting paid in these matters took months or years. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 4:28 pm by Law Lady
THE FLORIDA BAR, Defendant-Appellee. 11th Circuit.Employer -- Employee relations -- Family and Medical Leave Act -- Employee who was demoted after returning from statutorily protected maternity leave sued employer, alleging that her maternity leave impermissibly contributed to her demotion -- Employer was entitled to judgment as a matter of law on claims that employer violated Family and Medical Leave Act both by interfering with plaintiff's FMLA rights and retaliating against her for… [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 9:56 am by Kent Scheidegger
The US Supreme Court decided a crime-related civil procedure case involving qualified immunity in Ortiz v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 5:00 am by Don Cruse
As a threshold matter, the Court first discussed whether each was “an employee of a governmental unit” within the scope of § 101.106(f). [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 10:10 am by Michael O'Hear
Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement and Power District, 109 F.3d 586, 595 (9th Cir. 1997)), rev’d, 623 F.3d 990 (9th Cir. 2010); Ortiz v. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 2:58 pm by Sergio Campos
"  As an initial matter, any rule will have an impact that may "abridge, enlarge, or modify" a substantive right. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 7:39 am
Furthermore, getting into an accident, no matter how minor, will only make things worse for a driver who may have already violated New Jersey's anti-drunk driving laws. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 1:23 pm by Sergio Campos
Thus, the solution is a matter of rejiggering the incentives of the class attorneys, or, "design. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 1:23 pm by Sergio Campos
Thus, the solution is a matter of rejiggering the incentives of the class attorneys, or, "design."  [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 11:00 am by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
" "There is a difference between legal advocacy based on the facts and distorting the facts to cover up the truth," said Carmen Ortiz, U.S. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 4:19 am by Maxwell Kennerly
"There is a difference between legal advocacy based on the facts and distorting the facts to cover up the truth," said Carmen Ortiz, U.S. [read post]