Search for: "Matter of Sanchez v Sanchez" Results 301 - 320 of 341
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Nov 2009, 9:21 am
Wilner served as counsel of record to Guantanamo detainees in Rasul v. [read post]
24 May 2023, 11:02 am by John Elwood
Watson, 22-412Issue: Whether any amendment to a law originally adopted for an impermissible racially discriminatory purpose, no matter how minor the amendment and no matter the historical context, cleanses the law of its racist origins for 14th Amendment purposes unless the party challenging the law can prove that the amendment itself was motivated by racial discrimination. [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 12:52 pm
  Is it private simply due to the subject matter of the information - is information of a sexual nature, for example, automatically private? [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 9:00 am by Benjamin Wittes
Peters revisited her previous commentary on the NSA Affair, in which she has argued that the NSA programs are illegal as a matter of international law. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 2:35 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Further, it orders that the plea be vacated, the identification testimony suppressed and the matter remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County for further proceedings consistent with the case. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 5:17 pm
Whitley, No. 06-0131 In a criminal law matter, petition for review of decision denying rehearing is denied where the court declined to depart from the literal wording of the "except" clause of 18 U.S.C. section 924(c)(1)(A). . [read post]
Dec. 357 (BIA 1996). 7 Matter of A-T, 24 I & N Dec. 275 (BIA 2007). 8 Bah v. [read post]
13 May 2008, 1:35 pm
Genao-Sanchez, No. 05-1402 Sentence for drug conspiracy, conspiring to use a firearm in furtherance of a drug conspiracy, and aiding and abetting the commission of a crime, is vacated and remanded where: 1) the district court's failure to convene a new sentencing hearing deprived defendant the opportunity to argue his position both as to matters of fact relevant to sentencing, and as to the appropriate sentence to be imposed; and 2) thus, the error was prejudicial. [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 4:49 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
You can’t be uncertainty averse to both; what matters is relative salience; whether people treat those as losses v. gains, etc.Q: what about people who just decide not to take either risk? [read post]