Search for: "Matter of T S B"
Results 301 - 320
of 19,498
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Aug 2013, 5:01 pm
DJIA, S&P 500 or NASDAQ […]. [read post]
8 May 2023, 4:01 am
Interest on Fair Value Awards: The Statutes Here’s another important difference: Under § 1118(b), “the court, in its discretion, may award interest from the date the petition is filed to the date of payment for the petitioner’s share at an equitable rate” (italics added). [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 6:01 pm
The present board holds that the principles set out in T 1212/97 (affirmed by T 12/01 [20]; T 667/01 [2]) apply to the present case. [5.5] In T 1212/97 [3] the Board did not consider evidence from the lecturer alone as being satisfactory evidence as to what was made available to the public at the lecture. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 3:01 pm
T 1886/06 [1.4.2]). [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 5:01 pm
The decision was based on the request filed on October 31.The Board of appeal found that the applicant’s right to be heard had been violated:Fundamental deficiencies[3] The appellant contests the decision of the ED essentially for both procedural and substantive matters. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 6:53 am
"[I]t is possible that some of the patent applications that [plaintiff's original law firm's] lawyers were pursuing on behalf of Plaintiff were 'directly adverse' to the Defendants' interests. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 9:18 am
But I don’t see how that matters here. [read post]
28 Dec 2020, 1:00 am
This is a decision with the second highest distribution classification 'B'. [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 8:29 am
Claim 1 of the appellant's request reads:"1. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 6:00 am
“This is real and it’s moving very quickly. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 6:53 am
"[Plaintiff] argues that the jury deliberations took only 45 minutes, and '[t]hese cursory 'deliberations' yielded a verdict counter to the great weight of the evidence.' However, '[b]rief jury deliberation is not, in itself, sufficient basis to support a new trial motion. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 11:49 am
The NLRB’s decision doesn’t mean that wearing BLM is always a protected activity. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 8:30 am
The MCOA reversed and remanded the matter back to the trial court stating: “we find that the trial court clearly erred by concluding that the children’s safe placement with their” father barred its exercise of jurisdiction under MCL 712A.2(b). [read post]
15 Nov 2006, 4:03 am
However, the plaintiffs didn't really move under FRCP 60(b), but rather filed "a motion to transfer venue in which, rather than objecting to the Rule 12(b)(6) motion, it asserted that it ‘intend[ed] to file an amended complaint as a matter of right.'" Obviously, this goes nowhere. [read post]
The Rule 54(b) Trap: Dealing with Non-final Orders in Cases with Multiple Claims or Multiple Parties
15 Nov 2010, 12:27 pm
- Civil 3 (Addition to Reporter’s Notes, 2010 Amendment). [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 6:33 am
What that opinion’s going to be is another matter. [read post]
27 Aug 2021, 1:32 pm
The fact that the (allegedly crappy) work was done in Virginia, or that there was no actual lawsuit filed here yet, wouldn't matter. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 5:01 pm
Other possible irregularities do not preclude rectification of the decision, since an applicant should have the right of examination in two instances (for example T 139/87, T 47/90, T 794/95).[4] Claim 1 of the request which formed the basis for the impugned decision has been amended such that present claim 1 is now directed to a system for humidifying gas for infusion into a patient eye comprising a gas source, as defined in former claim 5. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 6:33 am
In Matter of T.Y. v. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 8:46 am
How can you reach the "substantial" threshold on a gateway (b) defence/counterclaim when you haven't had sight of the claimant's papers which may (or may not) enable your gateway (b) defence/counterclaim to be made out? [read post]
