Search for: "May Broadcasting Co. v. United States" Results 301 - 320 of 396
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jun 2021, 4:17 pm by INFORRM
Data Privacy and Data Protection On 26 May 2021 the Court of Appeal handed down judgment in R (Open Rights Group) v Secretary of State for Home Department [2021] EWCA Civ 800. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 1:25 pm
– Discussion of IPFrontline.com article ‘Understanding Intellectual Property Value’: (IP finance), How to make sure your IP strategy plan is not doomed to failure: (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) Improve venture capital returns with IP portfolio management: (Ezine @rticles)   Global - Trade Marks / Domain Names / Brands Trade mark strategy – counterintuitive names: (IP Thinktank), ICANN Intellectual Property Constituency paper on sunrise mechanisms for… [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 2:21 pm by Bexis
FCC, 512 U.S. 622, (1994); United States v. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 5:00 am
(Spicy IP) Copyright in characters – III – Delhi High Court decision in Raja Pocket Books v Radha Pocket Books (Spicy IP)   Kenya Anti-Counterfeit Bill 2008 passed (Afro-IP) Kenya’s new anti-counterfeit legislation discussion (Afro-IP)   Kuwait Kuwait adopts international classes 42-45 (Kuwaitmark)   Macedonia New Industrial Property Law (Class 46)   Nigeria Court moves from Uyo to continue proceedings in New York in… [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Michigan Chamber of Commerce and of the four dissenters in Citizens United v. [read post]
18 May 2013, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
Alice Corp http://t.co/4b9u2FKyC6 -> Is a broadcast to everyone private under the Copyright Act? [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
(Afro-IP)   Peru Peru approves ratification of PCT (Patent Docs) (Managing Intellectual Property)   Philippines Government says Philippines should be removed from US government watch list, despite claims from American lobby groups (ContentAgenda)   Poland DIX versus DIX or judgment versus judgment (Class 46) PPO’s invalidates figurative mark belonging to FIRMA BATCZEW Stanislaw Komperda incorporating elements similar to EU flag (Class 46)   Russia Video… [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 6:45 am by Nathaniel Grow
United States, in which the Court famously stated "it is competition, not competitors, which the [Sherman] Act protects. [read post]
15 Mar 2008, 7:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: WIPO Copyright Committee 16th session to discuss Broadcast Treaty, new proposal for exceptions and limitations agreement: (Public Knowledge), (Public Knowledge), (Intellectual Property Watch), (Public Knowledge), (Public Knowledge), (IPwar’s), (Intellectual Property Watch), (KEI), (Public Knowledge), (IP Justice), (IP Justice), (KEI),… [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 5:56 am by Maxwell Kennerly
That said, the first patent was granted to Dodgeball, which raises the question: why wasn't it cited by Facebook to the United States Patent and Trademark Office? [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 1:25 pm by rainey Reitman
Xavier Becerra and United States of America v. [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 5:54 pm by INFORRM
United States The satirical publication The Onion has filed an amicus curiae brief with th [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 10:12 pm by Lara
  Switch has spent millions of dollars to advertise and promote the SWITCH marks in print, broadcast media and on the internet through the Switch website, accessible throughout the United States and around the world at . . . [read post]
15 Oct 2019, 3:56 pm by Patricia Hughes
However, while the Court has not easily relied on unwritten principles alone, it has “recogniz[ed] a legal power fundamental to the constitutional regime which Canada has adopted in its Constitution Acts, 1867 to 1982” (New Brunswick Broadcasting Co. [read post]
28 Oct 2012, 2:52 pm by Nathaniel Baca
The local law enforcement agency may set forth how often such copies shall be provided to it. [read post]
28 Oct 2012, 2:52 pm by Nathaniel Baca
The local law enforcement agency may set forth how often such copies shall be provided to it. [read post]
1 Sep 2012, 3:10 pm by Russell Beck
Nevada: The United States District Court for the District of Nevada held in Switch Communications Group v. [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 5:54 am by Ryan Goodman
The speech, even if erroneous or knowingly false might fall outside First Amendment protections, especially if they were spoken by an ordinary person, not the President of the United States. [read post]