Search for: "McCann v. McCann" Results 301 - 320 of 379
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Mar 2010, 7:57 pm by David Stras
McCann (Vermont Law School) has posted “American Needle v. [read post]
20 Feb 2010, 1:34 am by J
There is, however, no prohibition on the court considering conduct which pre or post-dates the complaint - Chief Constable of West Mercia Constabulary v Boorman [2005] EWHC 2559 (Admin); Stevens v South East Surrey Magistrates' Court [2005] EWHC 1456 (Admin); Birmingham City Council v Dixon [2009] EWHC 761 (Admin). [read post]
20 Feb 2010, 1:34 am by J
There is, however, no prohibition on the court considering conduct which pre or post-dates the complaint - Chief Constable of West Mercia Constabulary v Boorman [2005] EWHC 2559 (Admin); Stevens v South East Surrey Magistrates' Court [2005] EWHC 1456 (Admin); Birmingham City Council v Dixon [2009] EWHC 761 (Admin). [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 6:37 am by cornellvermontlaw
   For a more in-depth take you might consider Professor McCann’s article: McCann, Michael A., American Needle v. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 6:12 am by Adam Chandler
Stohr quotes law professor Michael McCann saying that American Needle "'could become the most important sports law case in U.S. history.'" At the Volokh Conspiracy, John Elwood ponders the Court's much-delayed cert. decision in Noriega v. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 5:12 am by Dave
We've been a bit slow on this one, but R v Horncastle [2009] UKSC 14 offers further light on the quarter pounder v royale with cheese debate, which has occupied much of our time this year. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 5:12 am by Dave
We've been a bit slow on this one, but R v Horncastle [2009] UKSC 14 offers further light on the quarter pounder v royale with cheese debate, which has occupied much of our time this year. [read post]
1 Nov 2009, 4:30 pm by Mark Beese
Coulter, Vice President and Chair, Client Development and Growth Practice, Hildebrandt José Cunningham, Chief Marketing Officer, Crowell & Moring LLP Beth Cuzzone, Director of Business Development, Goulston & Storrs Patrick V. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 6:16 am
  Zehentner v Austria, a judgment of the First Section of the European Court of Human Rights, demonstrates yet again that the ECHR has a different approach to mandatory rights to possession than the House of Lords has expressed in the trilogy of cases (Buckley, Connors, McCann and Cosic against Qazi, Kay, Doherty). [read post]