Search for: "McDONALD v. STATE" Results 301 - 320 of 1,976
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Dec 2020, 11:07 am by Matthew Kahn
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit disagreed, concluding that it was bound by its 2010 decision in United States v. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 4:27 pm by INFORRM
” (emphasis added) Applying this wisdom to Article 10 which accords to society to right to receive (true) information, Lord Hobhouse states that the working of a democratic depends on society not being misinformed. [read post]
13 Nov 2020, 4:00 am by SHG
Richard Kopf Why CLS proves that Buck v. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 8:18 pm by Josh Blackman
[He talked about COVID and Religious Liberty, the Second Amendment, Free Speech, and "Bullying" of the Supreme Court by U.S. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 5:50 pm by Eugene Volokh
Supreme Court] decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass'n, Inc v City of New York (2020)…. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 7:04 am by Derek T. Muller
”As to the dissenting opinion, it’s worth framing the matter from Supreme Court precedent as Chief Justice Earl Warren did in McDonald v. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 3:56 pm by Eugene Volokh
McDonald stated that his business "lost approximately $300,000 in revenue" and that his business has been "financially devastated. [read post]
10 Sep 2020, 5:03 pm by Eugene Volokh
From Judge Patrick Bumatay's dissent from denial of rehearing en banc today in Mai v. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 5:05 pm
As we head into a hot holiday weekend, here are some appellate items to explore:Today's DJ has Justice Moore's piece on Jackie Robinson, United States v. 2LT Jack R Robinson as well as Marc Alexander's book review: Notorious RBG Talks Life, Love, Liberty, and LawThe Recorder's On Appeals column has Katy Graham's The Far-Reaching Effects of a Landmark Decision on the Standard of Appellate Review for Clear and Convincing Evidence.Tuesday's… [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 5:02 am by Eugene Volokh
Plus principle (ii) is an endorsement of the view (rejected by the Court two years later in McDonald v. [read post]