Search for: "McGuire v. McGuire" Results 301 - 320 of 433
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Mar 2010, 3:46 am
Further, said the court, nothing in the record suggests that Department’s rejection of his explanations for these failures to comply with its rules was irrational.In York v McGuire, 63 NY2d 760, the Court of Appeals indicated that "it is well settled that a probationary employee may be discharged without a hearing and without a statement of reasons" where the decision is made in good faith and not for a constitutionally impermissible purpose or reason. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 4:15 am
Further, said the court, nothing in the record suggests that Department's rejection of his explanations for these failures to comply with its rules was irrational.In York v McGuire, 63 NY2d 760, the Court of Appeals indicated that "it is well settled that a probationary employee may be discharged without a hearing and without a statement of reasons" where the decision is made in good faith and not for a constitutionally impermissible purpose or reason. [read post]
2 May 2008, 10:00 am
McGuire $72,650 $32,180 $20,370 — $125,200 Mary Lake Polan, M.D. [read post]
21 Oct 2008, 8:23 am
" (Matter of Daben Corp., 469 F Supp 135, 141 [DPR 1979]; see also Stecher v 85th Estates Co., 43 AD3d 732, 743 [1st Dept 2007] [McGuire, J., dissenting]; 2657 East 68th Street Corp. v Bergen Beach Yacht Club, 161 Misc 2d 1031, 1033 [Civ Ct, Kings County 1994].) [read post]
24 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
We have so far left open the possibility that injuries caused by the intentional acts of a third party might in some cases satisfy the requirements for ADR, and continue to do so today (see Matter of Walsh v Scoppetta, 18 NY3d 850, 852 [2011]; see also McCambridge v McGuire, 62 NY2d 563, 567 [1984] [the focus of the inquiry is on "the precipitating cause of injury"]; Arthur A. [read post]
24 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
We have so far left open the possibility that injuries caused by the intentional acts of a third party might in some cases satisfy the requirements for ADR, and continue to do so today (see Matter of Walsh v Scoppetta, 18 NY3d 850, 852 [2011]; see also McCambridge v McGuire, 62 NY2d 563, 567 [1984] [the focus of the inquiry is on "the precipitating cause of injury"]; Arthur A. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 9:29 pm by Kysa Crusco
An interesting case that distinguishes direct contempt versus indirect contempt is Kristen McGuire v. [read post]
6 Dec 2019, 5:02 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  In Knopf v Esposito  2019 NY Slip Op 33468(U) November 27, 2019 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 150315/2019 Judge: Gerald Lebovits. [read post]