Search for: "Million v State"
Results 301 - 320
of 24,533
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Mar 2024, 10:01 pm
Block Mining, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 12:56 pm
In Oneok, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 9:28 am
To understand the dispute, one has to go back to the relatively new State of New York law that requires the prosecution to provide to the defense, in sufficient time to prepare for trial, all relevant documents (CPL section 245.20). [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 4:00 am
Invalidity lawsuits The trial judgment rendered by the State Court in Zoetis v. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 7:30 pm
The amount was significantly lower than the 342 million Yuan (around US$ 50 million) claimed by ACT. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 11:42 am
In National Small Business United, d/b/a the National Small Business Association, et al. v. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 5:52 am
Additional Protocol I, article 50(3); ICTY Prosecutor v. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 7:22 pm
One year later, three insurance companies acknowledged that some of the NRA-endorsed programs violated state law, and they agreed not to provide any such programs to New York residents and to pay fines of up to $7 million. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 12:06 pm
Exclusionary zoning is permitted under Euclid v. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 7:44 am
On March 1, 2024, our collective efforts on this project — the Caselaw Access Project — culminated in the full, unrestricted release of nearly 7 million U.S. state and federal court decisions representing the bulk of our nation’s common law. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 5:23 am
From Tuesday's Fourth Circuit decision in Duvall v. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 4:32 am
In 2012, Tao solicited Behler to invest $3 million in a publicly traded company Tao controlled called Remark Holdings. [read post]
17 Mar 2024, 7:17 pm
The companies agreed not to provide any NRA-endorsed insurance programs to New York residents and to pay fines ranging from $1.3 to $7 million. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 1:01 am
In Fletcher v. [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 7:12 pm
In a case being heard Monday at the Supreme Court, 45 Washington lawmakers have argued that government communications with social media sites about possible election interference misinformation are illegal.Agencies can't even pass on information about websites state election officials have identified as disinformation, even if they don't request that any action be taken, they assert.Yet just this week the vast majority of those same lawmakers said the government's interest in… [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 12:35 pm
In Smith v. [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 9:18 am
From Justice Barrett's unanimous opinion this morning in Lindke v. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 10:36 am
Double Diamond Distribution Ltd. v. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 10:07 am
Last week, Bayer broke its Philadelphia losing streak, with a win in Kline v. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 9:08 am
[2] See Senators Wiener & Stern Respond to Governor Pausing Funding To Implement Landmark Climate Laws | Senator Scott Wiener (ca.gov) [3] Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, et al. v. [read post]
