Search for: "Minus v. State" Results 301 - 320 of 871
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Apr 2019, 7:31 am by Carl Neff
On April 17, 2019, the Delaware Supreme Court reversed a significant appraisal decision from the Delaware Court of Chancery in Verition Partners Master Fund, Ltd. v. [read post]
12 Sep 2009, 10:00 pm
Feliciano, 2:09−cr−00197−NS. [read post]
12 Sep 2009, 10:00 pm
Feliciano, 2:09−cr−00197−NS. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am by Bexis
  Comment k could correspond to Led Zeppelin, and state of the art might be The Who.And it seems that, for each of these bands, there’s a song we really like that gets slighted (in our opinion) when it comes to air time on classic rock stations. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 6:10 am
The state of Illinois determines child support payments using a strategy known as the “income shares method. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 5:02 am
Well, we only have two weeks left in the semester in my employment law class at Penn State. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 1:30 pm
P. 23 and its state-law analogs, courts seem to have a hard time remembering that. [read post]
29 Sep 2021, 10:25 am
That sales price, minus any debts, then becomes the stated value of the business. [read post]
18 Oct 2016, 1:07 pm by Amy Howe
On Monday the federal government filed, at the court’s invitation, a brief in Howell v. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 6:39 pm by Eric S. Solotoff
  In fact, the Child Support Guidelines includes, but is not limited to 23 possibilities for income, as follows: a. compensation for services, including wages, fees, tips, and commissions; b. the operation of a business minus ordinary and necessary operating expenses (see IRS Schedule C); c. gains derived from dealings in property; d. interest and dividends (see IRS Schedule B); e. rents (minus ordinary and necessary expenses - see IRS Schedule E); f. bonuses and royalties;… [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 8:56 am by Kevin Kaufman
Since the Supreme Court’s decision in Murphy v. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 5:16 am
June. 13, 2013), even though the Alabama Supreme Court thankfully agreed to reconsider the case, Weeks was such a terrible ruling – the only state high court to recognize innovator drug liability (which we also call “Conte”) where the innovator didn’t even sell the product that the plaintiff used  that we give it our #5 spot even after the reconsideration. [read post]
24 Dec 2009, 5:43 pm by Victoria VanBuren
Mattel Jun. 9, 2008 Professor Alan Scott Rau Gives Justice Souter a C-minus Jun. 5, 2008 Glen Wilkerson on Hall Street v. [read post]
23 Aug 2013, 3:51 pm
 The load that Estes got caught with here (even minus the babies) was sold for over $75,000. [read post]