Search for: "Moses, Appeal of" Results 301 - 320 of 421
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Oct 2010, 5:10 pm by INFORRM
  This is illustrated by the recent decision of the Court of Appeal (Lord Neuberger MR, Moses and Mumby LJJ) in Imerman v. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 6:45 am by familoo
The LSC is ‘considering its options’ following Moses J’s judgment yesterday that the family legal aid tender process was unlawful. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 8:05 pm by INFORRM
  As Moses LJ put it: “That he police are pursuing an investigation of corruption against a fellow police officer is a matter of public interest because corruption undermines the necessary public trust in those responsible for upholding the law and protecting the public. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 10:00 pm by Rosalind English
This question of precedent will shortly be exercising the Supreme Court when it hears the leapfrogged appeal in the DNA case of GC and C v Metropolitan Police Commissioner . [read post]
2 Sep 2010, 11:42 am by The Recorder
With the appeal period recently lapsed, Irell & Manella partner and lead trial counsel Marc Maister said: “It’s final now. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 3:35 am by Adam Wagner
However, interestingly, Lord Justice Moses went on to grant permission to appeal directly to the Supreme Court (a ‘leapfrog’ appeal, which bypasses the Court of Appeal), an appeal which he made clear was far from a foregone conclusion: No one can properly predict the conclusion that the Supreme Court might reach. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 12:39 am by INFORRM
The Court of Appeal consisting of the Master of the Rolls Lord Neuberger,  Lord Justice Moses and Lord Jusitice  Mumby, considered the detailed disclosure rules in family proceedings; analysed the existing fundamental priciples of the law of confidence and considered the obligations as between spouses. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 3:50 am
The Court of Appeal (with Lord Neuberger, Master of the Rolls, reading the judgment to which both Lord Justice Moses and Lord Justice Munby contributed) allowing Vivian's appeal and dismissing that of the Tchenguiz clan and their solicitor. [read post]
1 Aug 2010, 7:34 am by INFORRM
, Lord Justice Moses and Lord Justice Munby. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 11:29 pm by INFORRM
“Lest it be thought the conclusion of this court impedes attempts to add interest and colour to a story, the newspapers and their readers have only themselves to blame,” said Lord Justice Moses. [read post]
24 Jul 2010, 5:29 pm by INFORRM
On 29 July 2001 judgment will be given in Imerman v Tchenguiz (and linked appeals), heard 10 to 11 May 2010 by the Master of the Rolls, Moses and Munby LJJ. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 1:01 am by Matthew Hill
In his leading judgment, Moses LJ said that he had decided the case on the issue of precedent, rather than the substantive merits. [read post]
18 Jul 2010, 4:35 am by INFORRM
In Dillon v Cush; Dillon v Boland ([2010] NSWCA 165) the New South Wales Court of Appeal allowed the appeal of the defendant on the basis that the judge’s analysis of qualified privilege and malice was flawed. [read post]
17 Jul 2010, 2:11 am by INFORRM
Although there is Court of Appeal dicta to the contrary, (Kearns v General Council of the Bar [2003] EWCA 331.) it is submitted that this is inconsistent with dicta from the House of Lords decision in Jameel (at [54] and [118]) and that the Privy Council decision should be followed. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 7:28 am by INFORRM
First, there is the proper approach on appeal to the judge’s “balancing” decision. [read post]
11 Jul 2010, 2:43 am by INFORRM
Reserved Judgments The following reserved judgments in media and related cases remain outstanding: Imerman v Tchenguiz (and linked appeals), heard 10 to 11 May 2010 (Master of the Rolls, Moses and Munby LJJ) Ambrosiadou v Coward, heard 21, 22 June and 8 July 2010 (Eady J) Clift v Slough BC heard 23 and 24 June 2010 (Ward, Thomas and Richards LJJ). [read post]