Search for: "Mr. Arnold"
Results 301 - 320
of 1,688
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Apr 2017, 6:59 am
The second speaker was Mr Justice Richard Arnold who pointed to the draft “Great Repeal Act” which he noted does almost exactly the opposite of its title – repealing nothing but rather converting EU law into UK law at the moment of departure. [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 9:13 am
The panel was a veritable who's who with Margot Frohlinger (Principal Direcotr, Patent Law and Multilateral Affairs, EPO), Mr Justice Arnold (High Court, London), Trevor Cook (WilmerHale), Judge Klaus Grabinski (Federal Supreme Court, Karlsruhe), John Pegram (Fish & Richardson), Nicholas Saunders (Barrister, Brick Court Chambers) and Joel Smith (Herbert Smith Freehills). [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 7:09 am
Mr. [read post]
17 Apr 2017, 12:08 pm
Huff contends Mr. [read post]
15 Apr 2017, 4:17 am
An AIPPI Rapid Response Event I WIPO's statistics for 2016: Asia continues to roar I UK UPC ratification still on track despite Article 50 trigger I Does Mr Justice Arnold's decision in Teva v MSD show just how large a role patent law has come to play in assessing SPC validity? [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 3:52 am
Jane Lambert Court of Appeal Unwired Planet International Ltd v Huawei Technologies Co Ltd [2017] EWCA Civ 266 (12 April 2017) Lords Justices Gross and Floyd and Mr Justice Arnold In Unwired Planet International Ltd v Huawei Technologies Co Ltd and Others [2015] EWHC 3366 (Pat) (23 Nov 2015), Unwired Planet sued Huawei, Samsung and Google for patent infringement. [read post]
12 Apr 2017, 1:16 am
Does Mr Justice Arnold's decision in Teva v MSD show just how large a role patent law has come to play in assessing SPC validity? [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 7:35 am
A brief timeline:September 2015: On a referral from Mr Justice Arnold in an opposition by Cadbury to Nestlé’s UK trade mark application for a mark for the shape of the kit kat, the CJEU gives “guidance” on exactly what evidence was required to establish acquired distinctiveness of a mark. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 3:45 am
Mr Justice Arnold held it was not foreseeable that Actavis's product would be diluted with saline. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 7:35 am
With the aid of expert evidence, Mr Justice Arnold held that the construction of Claim 16 would include tenofovir (MSD successfully argued that it could be described as a nucleoside analog). [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 12:13 pm
Arnold) the Plaintiff was involved in two vehicle collisions. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 8:36 am
Thanks as well to Scott Gartner, the Director, Penn State School of International Affairs, and special thanks to Claudia Prieto (SIA Academic Adviser and Student Services Coordinator) and Rachel Arnold (Assistant to the Financial Officer, Penn State Law/SIA), without whose help and encouragement this program would not have happened. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 8:34 am
"The new block will enable a proportionate and targeted restriction of content that would otherwise have been proliferated to unauthorised websites and IPTV devices," said the Premier League after it secured the court order from Mr Justice Arnold on Wednesday. [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 8:38 am
Arnold v. [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 1:02 pm
Mr Justice Arnold refused AbbVie's application ([2016] EWHC 2204). [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 9:08 am
With the ratification of the UPC by the UK government in the face of Brexit, clarification on practical solutions on second medical use patents and developments from the first trade secret litigation in the US, this year’s Forum is not to be missed.The current 25+ speaker line-up features participation from the European Patent Office, IBM, Nokia, DSM, Nissan, Novartis, Qualcomm, PSA Peugeot Citroen, Intel, US Chamber of Commerce, Ericsson, Barclays, BT, BAE Systems and many more.Topics… [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 1:22 pm
| The next round of Cartier: UK Supreme Court will hear appeal re costs of intermediary injunctions | New National IP Strategic Action Plan in China | Full decision of Enlarged Board of Appeal in partial priority / poisonous divisionals referral (G01/15) published | INGRES Conference Part II - Trade Secret, Copyright, Design and Trade Mark Law Developments | 5 mistakes to avoid in IP student essays ... and not only there | INGRES Conference Part I - European Patent Law Developments | Remembering… [read post]
26 Feb 2017, 3:31 am
| Willow Tea Rooms: A tale of tea and trade marks Part 1 | The next round of Cartier: UK Supreme Court will hear appeal re costs of intermediary injunctions | New National IP Strategic Action Plan in China | Full decision of Enlarged Board of Appeal in partial priority / poisonous divisionals referral (G01/15) published |INGRES Conference Part II - Trade Secret, Copyright, Design and Trade Mark Law Developments |5 mistakes to avoid in IP student essays ... and not only there | INGRES Conference Part… [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 11:15 pm
| Willow Tea Rooms: A tale of tea and trade marks Part 1 | The next round of Cartier: UK Supreme Court will hear appeal re costs of intermediary injunctions | New National IP Strategic Action Plan in China | Full decision of Enlarged Board of Appeal in partial priority / poisonous divisionals referral (G01/15) published |INGRES Conference Part II - Trade Secret, Copyright, Design and Trade Mark Law Developments |5 mistakes to avoid in IP student essays ... and not only there | INGRES Conference Part… [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 9:50 pm
Neil Wilkof muses about the intriguing topic of keeping the ‘aura’ of artistic works that are preserved by technological means.The next round of Cartier: UK Supreme Court will hear appeal re costs of intermediary injunctionsEleonora Rosati discusses Cartier and Others v BSkyB and Others, after permission to appeal was granted by the UK Supreme Court regarding whether costs should be borne by right holders in the case of a blocking injunction granted due to trademark infringement.New… [read post]
