Search for: "Mr. Simons" Results 301 - 320 of 1,166
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Dec 2017, 4:18 pm by INFORRM
  Simon Hattenstone’s 2014 piece “Max Clifford: the rise and fall of the UK’s king of spin” has a longer discussion of Mr Clifford’s background and personality. [read post]
  When Crockfords, citing Mr Ivey’s use of ‘edge sorting’, refused to pay Mr Ivey his winnings – which amounted to some £7.7m – Mr Ivey initiated proceedings for the recovery of the winnings in reliance on the gaming contract. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 4:30 pm by INFORRM
On 7 November 2017 the trial of Jake Wallis Simons v Craig Murray will begin. [read post]
24 Oct 2017, 6:26 am
Here's something Scott Adams wrote (in the WSJ) about Trump's imperfect speech:When Mr. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 8:17 am
RetroKatsDarren Meale (Simmons & Simmons and IPEC DDJ) returns with the second volume of his round up of trade mark litigation. [read post]
8 Oct 2017, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
  Mr Hurst was a former member of British Military intelligence. [read post]
7 Oct 2017, 11:57 am
Weinstein at a celebrity lunch she arranged at the Four Seasons in 2002 with Mike Nichols, Nora Ephron, Carly Simon and others, and again at the BAFTA awards when Mr. [read post]
23 Jul 2017, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
Nigeria Ex-Commissioner of Police, Alhaji Abubakar Tsav has been ordered to pay N10m as damages to Governor Samuel Ortom’s aide, Mr. [read post]
18 Jul 2017, 1:08 am by Jani Ihalainen
The US Supreme Court endeavoured to answer this question once and for all this summer.The case of Joseph Matal v Simon Shiao Tam dealt with a rock band, The Slants, who sought to register their name as a trademark in the US. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
In some respects, the Tam case was a missed opportunity to move the doctrine forward for future disputes.For present purposes I needn’t wallow in the facts; Mr. [read post]
4 Jul 2017, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
Indeed, under the 1992 Supreme Court ruling in Simon & Schuster, Inc. v. [read post]