Search for: "Music v. United States" Results 301 - 320 of 2,053
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Apr 2021, 7:25 am by Terry Hart
United States Copyright Office Annual Report 2020 [PDF] — The Office published its annual report this week, covering a year marked by a global pandemic and leadership changes within the Office itself. [read post]
4 Mar 2021, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
Furthermore, in Handyside v United Kingdom Strasbourg accepted that freedom of speech applies to views which shock and offend and which are heartily disapproved of by the recipient [49]. [read post]
5 Feb 2021, 11:56 pm by Josh Blackman
[The Court is badly fractured, as Justice Barrett writes her first separate writing. ] Around 10:45 PM ET on Friday evening, the Supreme Court decided South Bay United Pentecostal Church v. [read post]
18 Jan 2021, 5:00 am by Josh Blackman
Quoted in 10 years after landmark Citizens United Supreme Court decision, record cash flooding US elections, ABC News (Jan. 20, 2020). [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 11:05 am by Jonathan Bailey
This means that, between 1998 and 2018 no new works entered the public domain the United States. [read post]
27 Dec 2020, 11:20 am by Eric Goldman
Oct. 21, 2020): “because the infringing act of downloading the material occurred on a computer outside the United States, there was no act in the United States to establish jurisdiction” * Donat v. [read post]
20 Dec 2020, 11:02 am by Anastasiia Kyrylenko
Will a license agreement, designating “the countries of the European Union”, be considered to also cover the United Kingdom? [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
The moving and opposition briefs were filed before the United States Supreme Court entered an injunction pendente lite in the case of Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn, New York v. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 4:06 am by rainey Reitman
(Pamela Samuelson’s Commentary on UMG v Augusto and Vernor v Autodesk) Vernor v Autodesk (EFF Amicus Brief in Key Case re First Sale and Contracts, Following UMG v Augusto) MDY v Blizzard (Justia) A Mixed Ninth Circuit Ruling in MDY v Blizzard: WoW Buyers Are Not Owners – But Glider Users Are not Copyright Infringers (EFF’s Commentary on MDY v Blizzard) Capitol Records v ReDigi (Wikipedia) Court’s… [read post]
4 Dec 2020, 3:21 am
The Board found that the phrase is a common expression of patriotism, affection, or affiliation with the United States of America that will not be perceived as a source indicator. [read post]