Search for: "NATIONAL BANK OF COMMERCE v. STATE" Results 301 - 320 of 608
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 May 2019, 8:14 am by Sarah Grant
The Commerce Department may require that American companies obtain government approval to supply components to Hikvision, which plays a key role in the Chinese surveillance state. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 7:40 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
In the Name of the Child: Race, Gender, and Economics in Adoptive Couple v. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 7:40 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
In the Name of the Child: Race, Gender, and Economics in Adoptive Couple v. [read post]
18 Nov 2024, 10:26 pm by Malcolm Hartwell
  These rules have been ratified by over 95 states and are usually contractually incorporated into bills of lading or apply compulsorily to bills of lading as a result of national legislation. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am by David Kris
  International agreements could help reduce this dissonance, and rationalize surveillance rules to promote international commerce, law enforcement, protection of civil liberties, and the worldwide rule of law. [read post]
30 Sep 2020, 9:05 pm by Herbert Hovenkamp
Philadelphia National Bank, the Court held that, although banking regulators had the power to approve bank mergers, they did not evaluate competitive effects as antitrust law did. [read post]
27 Mar 2008, 12:08 pm
  Patents, copyright and trademark laws provide vigorous, reliable protection for US intellectual property, which is valued at more than $5 trillion by the Commerce Department. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 3:23 am by Thornhill Law Firm, A PLC
As we know from the recent national health insurance debate, each state may pass mandates for coverage in its state. [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 7:35 am by Kristian Soltes
’s V 2.65% $5.3 billion deal to acquire Plaid Inc., a key player in the financial-technology space. [read post]
18 Aug 2007, 6:50 am
Otherwise Marshall's discussion of why navigation was commerce and why the government could regulate commerce that moves between state borders would have been superfluous.Moreover, as Matt knows, Marshall concludes Gibbons v. [read post]