Search for: "New York v. New York Telephone Co." Results 301 - 320 of 433
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Aug 2014, 4:41 am by Terry Hart
In Burrow-Giles Lithographic Co. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 3:50 pm by Eugene Volokh
Lynch) In 2015, plaintiff Shimshon Wexler brought a Telephone Consumer Protection Act ("TCPA") class action in the Eastern District of New York against AT&T, with his wife, Dr. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 9:20 am
The lesson being if you are going to die, die in Indiana.Raskopf cited the case of CMG Worldwide v The Upper Deck Co., Inc case where he acted for the defendant. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
See Note 44, ante (warning against broad liability schemes that would encourage landlords to act as law enforcement).[15] The New York intermediate appellate court took a similar view in Gill v. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 3:00 am by Terry Hart
S. 82 (1879); and Burrow-Giles Lithographic Co. v. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 4:29 am
The originality standard is a minimal degree of creativity as stipulated in Feist Publications v Rural Telephone Service Co., 499 U.S. 340 (1991). [read post]
10 Sep 2008, 1:25 pm
" The knuckleheads practice in Delaware, New York, and all over the country. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 9:27 am by Joel R. Brandes
Her contact with the child continued to be limited to telephone calls and daytime visits in the community because she refused to allow a caseworker to conduct a home visit. [read post]
21 May 2010, 12:05 pm by Steven Titch
As a young reporter for Electronic News, I remember watching New York Telephone Co. executives sweating through a New York State Public Service Commission rate hearing. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 4:02 pm
Does 1-16 in the District of New Mexico, Magistrate Judge Lorenzo F. [read post]
20 Jan 2010, 2:08 pm by Brett Trout
One day, the story goes, a businessman entered Moon Lake Lodge, in Saratoga Springs, New York. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 2:56 am by Kevin LaCroix
  In 2015, the New York State Supreme Court, Appellate Division – First Department, was faced with two matters, both of which addressed whether bonds issued to entities formed for the purposes of investing and trading in securities, covered losses the entities sustained by investing in Madoff’s Ponzi scheme.[7]  In 2009, Madoff pleaded guilty to 11 federal felonies and was sentenced to 150 years in prison, the maximum allowed. [read post]