Search for: "O. (R.) VS. C. (A.)"
Results 301 - 313
of 313
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Mar 2007, 9:14 am
AIDS; HIV; health care decs.Last Act: 03/16/07 referred to correction
LAW / CORRECTNSS438
SKELOS -- Makes the failure of a sex offender to register or verify pursuant to sex offender registration act, or working on an ice cream truck a class D felony BLURB : Cor. sex offender: fail register Last Act: 03/14/07 referred to correction
LAW / CORRECTNSS1277
LAVALLE -- Requires division of criminal justice services to provide additional information when sex offender absconds or becomes… [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 8:12 pm
C. difficilewas negative. [read post]
23 Dec 2018, 7:53 am
Pursuant to Federal Rules of Evidence 201(b)(2) and 201(c)(2), the Court takes judicial notice of the offered documents.[2]C. [read post]
24 Jul 2007, 8:51 pm
.: 42-1981-CF-170 4 5 STATE OF FLORIDA 6 vs. 7 IAN DECO LIGHTBOURNE, 8 Defendant. ------------------------------------------------------- 9 10 E X C E R P T 11 PROCEEDINGS: Continued Evidentiary Hearing 12 Concerning lethal Injection (Diaz Issue) 13 BEFORE: Honorable Carven D. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 2:11 pm
UPDATE ON NEESE VS. [read post]
21 Jul 2023, 9:01 am
CMS’ Consideration CMS to offer an initial meeting with the manufacturer CMS to meet with FDA counterparts to review the technology [Optional] CMS may initiate a benefit category review to determine whether the device—if approved—would likely be coverable through one or more benefit categories C. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 10:00 am
c. [read post]
31 Dec 2023, 3:50 am
Analog C: The “end of history” era. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 10:47 pm
The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 3:58 am
Making an Effective Case Directly to the TV Networks Jennifer Santos, Vice President, Ad Standards, NBC History of network challenges: 1971, FTC started encouraging comparative advertising. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 9:12 pm
Fairness in Numbers: A Comment on AT&T v. [read post]
16 Jan 2021, 10:57 pm
This includes courts in California, Delaware, Illinois, New York, and Washington.[26] To determine which category a letter of intent falls under, courts examine the intentions of the parties.[27] In fact, the primary factor of all letter of intent analysis is the intentions of the parties.[28] Intent is the “touchstone” upon which letter of intent litigation hinges.[29] C. [read post]
