Search for: "O. Perez" Results 301 - 320 of 425
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Mar 2017, 10:00 pm by Cookson Beecher
In a recent interview, O’Driscoll said EFI has certified another six of the company’s berry operations. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 9:24 am
Count 2 alleged that `[o]n or about June 21st, 2013, you [Dove], while on duty, provided a false statement to ... [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 4:11 am by Comunicaciones_MJ
Como ejemplo de ello el Supremo cita: …[c]on el paso del tiempo, las siguientes categorías han sido añadidas a la Ley contra el discrimen en el empleo mediante el mecanismo de enmiendas: (1) sexo; (2) orientación sexual; (3) identidad de género; (3) origen nacional; (4) afiliación política; (5) ideas políticas o religiosas; (6) ser víctima o ser percibida como víctima de violencia doméstica,… [read post]
2 Aug 2007, 2:02 pm
Charles Perez Bankruptcy Canada Blog bob tarantino Cavanagh Williams C'est é-patent! [read post]
6 Jan 2008, 11:40 am
Court Dept. 25 Amy Mastin, Family Court G Greta Muirhead, Family Court I Jamie Kent, Family Court J Rebecca Wallace, Family Court O Carl Piazza, Family Court Dept. [read post]
22 Sep 2018, 12:42 am
(Pix from video that may be accessed HERE)The recognition of one of the oldest elements that make up the rich diversity of American culture came only recently in the history of the nation. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 1:45 pm by Gustavo Arballo
Nunca menos: la no regresividad  Sí lo es la recepción de la Corte del principio de no regresividad o nunca menos, que como veremos se deriva del principio de progresividad. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 5:00 am by Bexis
  The claim must both parallel the federal requirements (and nothing more) while also being a traditional state-law claim not dependent upon the claimed FDCA violation:[T]o avoid the statutory preemption of state requirements that vary from federal requirements, a state claim concerning PMA devices must be parallel to the federal requirements, meaning that the state requirements it embodies must not impose any duty on the manufacturer beyond satisfying the federal requirements. [read post]