Search for: "Odom"
Results 301 - 320
of 403
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jul 2009, 1:20 am
In a July 5 post titled Patent Americana , PatentHawk (aka Gary Odom) extracts material from a law review article by Michael Martin, sometimes a contributor to the blog.The law review article, titled THE END OF THE FIRST-TO-INVENT RULE: A CONCISE HISTORY OF ITS ORIGIN, 49 IDEA 435 (2009), has a "conclusion" which states:Along with a summary of the history, I have argued in this article thatthe federalist structure of government in 1791â€â [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 5:18 am
About a month ago, the Nevada Supreme Court took a look at the so-called "heeding presumption" - and rejected it outright. [read post]
New York Appellate Criminal Cases Originating from the New York Supreme Court NY County - LexisNexis
9 Jun 2009, 12:45 pm
Odom, 585, 3211/05, SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT, 2009 NY Slip Op 4272; 2009 N.Y. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 12:44 am
At least pharma has patents for products that really benefit people.]Mike Masnick (TechDirt) takes on Gary Odom (PatentHawk)**Separately, here's the kind of thinking TechDirt inspires (from digitalmajority-->"Then i realized, i was an artist, and all the articles on ars, /., techdirt and here reminded me of patent trolls, copyright propoganda, ad nauseum. so, if i patent the ‘idea', which im sure is easy as fuck to do, then… [read post]
28 May 2009, 3:49 am
Supp;. 653, 659 n.2 (D.S.C. 1988), Odom v. [read post]
14 May 2009, 5:20 am
The federal lawsuit alleges that Jack Odom, of Odom Farms in Austin, Arkansas, brought the guestworkers to the U.S., forced them to live in deplorable conditions, and failed to pay them for their services. [read post]
13 May 2009, 11:40 am
The lawsuit against Jack Odom, doing business as Odom Farms in Austin, said the four Mexicans were brought to the United States under a federal guestworker program which allows employers to hire foreign workers if sufficient domestic [...] [read post]
5 May 2009, 2:08 am
Joining the ranks of Edison misunderstanders (including Jaffe/Lerner and Merges/Nelson), PatentHawk (Gary Odom) stated on 4 May 09:Thomas Edison never ran a company, never made a product, never sold anything but patents. [read post]
3 May 2009, 9:11 am
Riley Strickland, then 18, and Sidney Odom, who was 19, were both injured. [read post]
1 May 2009, 11:00 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 3:00 am
How would you rule in Odom's Tennessee Pride Sausage, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 1:01 am
See also Mike Masnick (TechDirt) takes on Gary Odom (PatentHawk), containing Joe Mullin's commenthttp://ipbiz.blogspot.com/2009/04/joe-mullin-on-copying.html**In passing, Senator Leahy had suggested that Arlen Specter had killed a previous Senate version of patent reform. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 9:38 pm
At the PatentHawk blog, Gary Odom writes on the CIPRO case:Stanford law professor Mark Lemley has penned a petition to the Supreme Court, to lay the burden of overturning reverse payments before the august body, this nation's numero uno woolly bully. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 12:23 pm
Travis Kirby was killed and Riley Strickland and Sidney Odom were injured. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 12:09 am
" Always a pleasant guy, that Odom. [read post]
25 Apr 2009, 9:16 pm
But Odom isn't a lawyer. [read post]
17 Apr 2009, 7:09 pm
Odom invented active tool groups, which Microsoft popularized with its Office 2007 Ribbon. [read post]
7 Apr 2009, 8:25 pm
Her remarks will be followed by a panel discussion involving:Ronnie Earle, former Travis County District Attorney, Mary Odom, Texas Department of Criminal Justice; and,John Sage, Bridges to LifeWith the personnel involved, I'm sure it will be an excellent program. [read post]
16 Mar 2009, 1:45 am
., 541 F.3d 425, 451 (2d Cir.2008) (affirming dismissal of civil RICO claim for failure to allege facts supporting Turkette factors); Odom v. [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 11:44 pm
In the post Jaw, PatentHawk (Gary Odom) wrote of Lemley's prepared testimony before the Senate on patent reform (S.515):However one may agree or disagree with Lemley, he has done his homework, and his stated positions are logical, if springing from flawed assumptions. [read post]
