Search for: "Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Grant "
Results 301 - 320
of 353
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Sep 2010, 10:01 am
The court in Katz relied on Bell v. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 8:19 am
The suit began in October of 2000, and ECUSA was named as a defendant.The next triennial budget was adopted at General Convention 2003, which saw the confirmation of the election of V. [read post]
8 Aug 2010, 8:49 pm
State v. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 1:07 pm
Citing Stump v. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 9:39 am
Nabors’ counsel requested the hearing be adjourned to a later date. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 4:22 am
Then the Town's attorney requested an adjournment of the hearing, and the hearing officer granted the request by rescheduling the hearing for May 18, 2006.The hearing officer again adjourned the hearing, this time until July 5, 2006 and ultimately the hearing was conducted on July 5, 2006, and July 28, 2006.The hearing officer issued a decision and order dated January 4, 2007, finding Nabors was guilty of all three charges. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 8:53 pm
LEXIS 975 (Ohio App 9th 3/24/2010) Postconviction relief denied on appeal on issues relating to failure to permit discovery, funding experts, ineffective assistance of counsel (trial court chose wrong standard to examine claims, failure to investigate and present, use of experts (cultural, DNA & neurological), as well as “lead counsel’s substance abuse, disciplinary investigation, and, ultimately, his arrest”) Ruben Gutierrez v. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 12:45 pm
” (Burlington Industries, v. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 7:12 am
The Scope of Workplace Privacy Rights In Hernandez v. [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 4:51 am
Todd v. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 2:35 pm
., v. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 4:23 pm
(Free Enterprise Fund and Beckstead & Watts v. [read post]
31 Aug 2009, 10:17 am
Commissioner of Correction ("On appeal, he claims that (1) his trial counsel was ineffective for not advising him of his appellate rights in connection with the denial of his motion to withdraw his plea, (2) his trial counsel was ineffective in his preparation for trial and (3) it was improper for the court to grant the motion filed by the respondent, the commissioner of correction, to quash the petitioner's subpoena duces tecum for the disciplinary… [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 3:30 am
The trial court grants summary judgment for the defendant, and the 5th District affirms in Norris v. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 3:12 pm
" Marbury v. [read post]
6 Jun 2009, 2:21 pm
Jun. 19, 2009)(Green) (public employment, police officers, disciplinary process, election of grievance remedies, city's failure to give pre-appeal notice not jurisdictional)CITY OF DESOTO, TEXAS v. [read post]
26 May 2009, 1:53 am
" Did not grant lodestar enhancement as requested by plaintiffs.Greenbaum v. [read post]
21 May 2009, 4:05 am
Appointing authority's final determination as whether or not to take disciplinary action against an employee controlsRosenblum v New York City Conflicts of Interest Board, 2009 NY Slip Op 31073(U), April 29, 2009, Supreme Court, New York County, Docket Number: 101121/09, Judge Jane S. [read post]
20 May 2009, 7:36 am
L v. [read post]
