Search for: "Other Interested Parties Amended"
Results 301 - 320
of 18,342
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Oct 2024, 4:34 am
”[2] From these official explanations, it can be concluded that the legislative purposes of incorporating “other appropriate connections” as a jurisdictional ground are threefold: (a) expanding jurisdiction over foreign-related cases, (b) protecting the rights of parties, and (c) safeguarding national and public interests. [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 6:15 am
The amendments require a notice in orders of protection that make it clear that the order of protection will remain in effect even if the protected party has, or consents to have, contact or communication with the restrained party and that the protected party cannot be held to violate an order issued in his/her favor nor can such party be arrested for violating such an order. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 5:08 am
Rather than empathy, though, the Fernandez decision itself seems to emphasize a different consideration: the implication of third-party interests that were not at issue in Riley: [A warrant] requirement may also impose an unmerited burden on the person who consents to an immediate search, since the warrant application procedure entails delay. [read post]
30 Jul 2016, 2:28 pm
Relatives, caregivers, and other parties often exploit their relationship with someone who is ill or dying in order to obtain an inheritance from their estate. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 3:59 am
In simple terms, the legislation, which amended various provisions of NJSA 34:13A-16, et. seq., revised the procedure for police and fire contract disputes and imposed a cap on certain interest arbitration awards. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 4:57 am
Rule 1.442 is amended to provide, in essence, that proposals for settlement need not be apportioned with respect to vicariously liable parties. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 7:57 am
These cases are often cited as examples of the “third-party doctrine” – the idea that the Fourth Amendment does not protect records or information that someone voluntarily shares with someone or something else. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 12:50 pm
City of Springfield, that raises an interesting Fourth Amendment question: When does a person have Fourth Amendment rights in the contents of a stolen computer? [read post]
15 Dec 2022, 5:14 pm
Access to protected industrial action: parties to a single-interest enterprise agreement or a supported bargaining agreement will be entitled to take protected industrial action. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 1:00 pm
Moreover, there is no need to seek leave from the parties. [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 6:07 am
In this case, due to the Unitarian Church’s status as the owner of property adjacent to the Church Street Lot, it clearly held an interest in the Fountain Square application to amend the Ordinance. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 10:30 am
*Second, Gorsuch recognizes that "the fact that a third party has access to or possession of your papers and effects does not necessarily eliminate your interest in them. [read post]
1 Aug 2017, 11:49 am
Nor is the privacy interest in location information, something traditionally exposed to the public and observable by the government, greater than the privacy interest in other types of documents clearly covered by the third-party doctrine. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 8:16 am
Other democracies, of course, do ban political parties. [read post]
15 Feb 2016, 10:42 am
Sliger’s proposed amended judgment awarded her interest from the date of the jury verdict in 2011. [read post]
20 Jan 2017, 9:29 am
In other words, which party is the more rightful “owner” under the law? [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 7:44 pm
Courts have routinely held that a Fifth Amendment claim of privilege will not substitute for other relevant evidence, pointing to the language of the U.S. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 6:47 pm
Major shareholders, controlled shareholders and other interested parties are prohibited, by the law, to act as trustees. [read post]
4 May 2008, 9:00 am
It is proposed to start an occasional digest of important news concerning law, court affairs, and public policy with necessary links - on issues which could interest us, but which we could not discuss in detail due to lack of time. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 6:57 am
Should the statutory licence in section 38 CRRA be amended to cover categories of work other than “sound recordings”? [read post]
