Search for: "Oxley, in Re"
Results 301 - 320
of 475
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Nov 2006, 6:13 am
The AXS-One Translator Tool has been designed to provide customers with access to messages that were previously archived without having to re-ingest them into the new environment. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 12:22 pm
They also need better communication about where their cases stand so they’re not sitting in limbo. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 9:30 pm
The panel would then recommend whether to repeal, replace, or re-new the legislation, with a requirement under the statute that Congress vote on the recommendation. [read post]
7 Apr 2012, 9:59 am
Title IV This is an attempt to re-vitalize Reg A. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 5:26 pm
This move mirrors the one in 2002’s Sarbanes-Oxley Act, dictating the power of audit committees who preside over financial reporting. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 1:59 pm
Sometimes it’s plausible, as in the Sarbanes-Oxley requirement that CEOs certify corporate financial statements. [read post]
8 Feb 2007, 10:30 am
The recent government enforcement efforts have been focused on accounting fraud, so if we’re seeing a greater decrease in accounting fraud claims than in non-accounting fraud claims, then Grundfest’s “supply side” story may be plausible. [read post]
17 Oct 2010, 1:56 pm
Section 105(c)(6) of the Sarbanes-Oxley authorizes the Board to impose sanctions on accounting firms and their supervisory personnel for failing reasonably to supervise associated persons who have violated certain laws, rules, or standards. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 3:00 am
We’re posting memos about this case in our “Whistleblowers” Practice Area. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 3:14 am
In re Vaalco Energy S’holder Litig., C.A. [read post]
2 Dec 2006, 1:52 pm
The multi-case functionality in both editions enables the re-use of prior document collections and reviews on related cases. [read post]
17 Aug 2007, 10:20 am
The focus on the way things are now, rather than they way they're going to be. [read post]
4 Apr 2010, 10:58 pm
This fee pressure is no doubt a trend that is here to stay - even the concerns arising from the financial crisis seem to be outweighed by the pressure on bottom lines to cut professional fees wherever possible and to put everything out for re-bid. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 11:00 am
SEC (In re Sherman Case No. 09-55880 (9th Cir. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 7:43 am
In a 5-4 vote, the justices said that the Sarbanes-Oxley law enacted in 2002 violates the Constitution's separation of powers mandate. [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 12:27 pm
State of Restatements In this report posted on our "Restatements" Practice Area, it appears as if perhaps Section 404 of Sarbanes-Oxley has had a positive effect on improving the quality of financial reporting (as well as quality of internal controls) at companies generally since restatements are now trending down, at least for companies over $75 million in market capitalization. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 10:30 am
Assuming the facts are as stated by the SEC, they’re fortunate. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 3:00 am
We’re posting the flood of memos in our “Whistleblowers” Practice Area. [read post]
24 Jan 2008, 6:08 pm
I voted against Sarbanes-Oxley. [read post]
27 Sep 2009, 6:26 pm
If you're a whistleblower who has been retaliated against, you should contact a lawyer immediately as your claims are likely subject to strict legal filing deadlines. [read post]
