Search for: "P. v. Germany"
Results 301 - 320
of 574
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Oct 2015, 7:00 am
Among the countries with the highest rate of approval of asylum requests were Germany (93%), Bulgaria (93%), the United Kingdom (89%), Belgium (89%), and France (83%). 2. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 8:02 am
L'avocate pénaliste Hannelore Cayre y faisait une peinture auvitriol de la« justicedes pauvres et des proxos », du côté de l'avocaten même temps que du côté du mis en examen. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 1:47 am
| Criminalisation of IP and economics | Keeping count of blocked websites in the UK |Birkin Bags | Patentability of user interface designs in Germany |Smith & Nephew v ConvaTec | Report on IPEC litigation |does Twitter have a future? [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 8:31 am
Whether features of a (usually three dimensional) sign that was formely protected by a patent can be the object of a valid trade mark registration has been the subject of quite a few decisions (see C-48-09 P (LEGO brick), IPKat post, joined Cases C‑337/12 P to C‑340/12 P (Yoshida knives), IPKat post, and TrafFix Devices, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Aug 2015, 7:57 pm
v=k745w6GNAfs International Principles on the Application of Human Rights to [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 1:54 am
p=855http://efni2012.efni.pl/danny-ainge-celtics-jersey/ [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 4:28 am
A comparative reprise", guest Kat Alberto Bellan discussed reactions to the decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in Case C-530/12 P OHIM v National Lottery Commission, [explained in his earlier Katpost here] in which that court set aside a decision of the General Court that had effectively allowed the cancellation of National Lottery's Community trade mark on the basis of evidence which was plainly fake but which… [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 2:47 am
Roth, p. 136). [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:28 am
Session 2: Establishing the Features of the Consumer The UK courts have in recent years been quite explicit that the consumer is a normative construct, a fiction, and a benchmark. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 4:34 am
Subject v. object: is TM law descriptive or normative? [read post]
25 May 2015, 4:15 am
The parties have been back in court to fight over other patents, resulting in the decision Synthon B.V. v Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd [2015] EWHC 1395 (Pat), which came out last week and which Darren reports in timely fashion.* When functionality cuts deep, it can be hard to handle: Yoshida appeal dismissedValentina's back again to pen on General Court's decision in Joined Cases C‑337/12 P to… [read post]
17 May 2015, 2:57 am
Siehr recalled the landmark cases of Attorney-General of New Zealand v Ortiz, [1984] AC 1, Winkworth v. [read post]
14 May 2015, 12:52 am
, Matteo Dragoni, University of Pavia (Italy)III.B Of Elites and their Influence· On Legal Elites and the Legal Profession in Cyprus, Nikitas Hatzimihail, University of Cyprus (Cyprus)· Anglo-Phone Legality: Ciceronian, Socratic and Derridian, Joseph P. [read post]
11 May 2015, 3:05 pm
* Norms of the sector and three-dimentional marks' distinctiveness: a complicated relationship.Valentina write up Case C-445/13 P , a CJEU decision regarding a 3-D trade mark consisting of the shape of a bottle and its distinctive character. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 4:36 am
VOORHOOF and P. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 9:51 am
Commission, case number C‑286/13 P. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 12:23 pm
Never too late 32 [week ending Sunday 8 February] –- Brazilian PTO’s delays | The Research Handbook on International Intellectual Property reviewed | Laura Smith-Hewitt | IP, women and leadership: the poll responses | Decline of West’s trust in innovation | Wikipedia public domain photos |CJEU in Case C-383/12 P Environmental Manufacturing LLP v OHIM | The Nordic IP Forum | The future of EPO’s BoA | Warner-Lambert v Actavis Mark 2 | Dragons'… [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 3:30 am
” (p. 44). [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 1:07 pm
In Fire and Police Pension Association of Colorado v. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 1:44 am
* European trade mark judges: it's time to join the Circle CET-J is an independent group of 15 trade mark judges from Austria, Hungary, Germany, Netherlands, Switzerland, Turkey, France the United Kingdom, Portugal, Italy, Germany, and OHIM. [read post]
